mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 06:45:12 -05:00
1.6 KiB
Executable file
1.6 KiB
Executable file
Debate 1
Human Experiment Reductio
Definiendum | Definiens |
---|---|
V | human studies (x) are vulnerable to bias and small effect sizes |
D | human studies (x) can demonstrate causality or support causal inference |
G | human studies (x) are garbage |
e | human experiments |
P1) If human studies are vulnerable to bias and small effect sizes, then human studies cannot demonstrate causality or support causal inference.
(∀x(Vx→¬Dx))
P2) Human experiments are vulnerable to bias and small effect sizes.
(Ve)
P3) If human experiments cannot demonstrate causality or support causal inference, then human experiments are garbage.
(¬De→Ge)
C) Therefore, human experiments are garbage.
(∴Ge)
(∀x(Vx→¬Dx))
P2) Human experiments are vulnerable to bias and small effect sizes.
(Ve)
P3) If human experiments cannot demonstrate causality or support causal inference, then human experiments are garbage.
(¬De→Ge)
C) Therefore, human experiments are garbage.
(∴Ge)
Hashtags
#clownery
#clowns
#epidemiology
#debate_opponents
#debate