mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 06:55:12 -05:00
632 B
Executable file
632 B
Executable file
Debate 1
Proposition
>"genetically engineering humans is bad?"
>"improving humanity through genetic alteration is bad?"
Analysis
- Is this in principle? Meaning all else equal?
- For example, let's say that we have two possible worlds that are equal, but in one world a human is genetically altered with at least one benefit to them and/or the people around them. Which world is better?
- If genetic alternation world is better, you're not against it in principle.
- If the "wildtype" world is better, then you're just crazy.
- For example, let's say that we have two possible worlds that are equal, but in one world a human is genetically altered with at least one benefit to them and/or the people around them. Which world is better?
Didn't disagree with my view.
Hashtags
#debate #debate_opponents