mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 15:45:11 -05:00
23 lines
632 B
Markdown
23 lines
632 B
Markdown
|
# Debate 1
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Proposition
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
~~>"genetically engineering humans is bad?"~~
|
||
|
|
~~>"improving humanity through genetic alteration is bad?"~~
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Analysis
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Is this in principle? Meaning all else equal?
|
||
|
|
1. For example, let's say that we have two possible worlds that are equal, but in one world a human is genetically altered with at least one benefit to them and/or the people around them. Which world is better?
|
||
|
|
1. If genetic alternation world is better, you're not against it in principle.
|
||
|
|
2. If the "wildtype" world is better, then you're just crazy.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Didn't disagree with my view.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Hashtags
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#debate
|
||
|
|
#debate_opponents
|