obsidian/🛡️ Debate/Opponents/Rakhi Sawant.md

52 lines
No EOL
1.7 KiB
Markdown
Executable file
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

### Argument for Eating Animals
| <font color="CC6600">**Definiendum**</font> | <font color="CC6600">**Definiens**</font> |
|:-------------------------------------------:|:------------------------------------------------ |
| <font color="CC6600">**P**</font> | it is immoral to kill someone (x) |
| <font color="CC6600">**Q**</font> | someone (x) values their life |
| <font color="CC6600">**R**</font> | someone (x) has the capacity to value their life |
| <font color="CC6600">**a**</font> | a given animal |
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> For all things, it is immoral to kill someone if, and only if, someone values their life or someone has the capacity to value their life.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∀x(Px↔(QxRx)))</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> A given animal do not value their life.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬Qa)</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> A given animal does not have the capacity to value their life.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬Ra)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, it is not immoral to kill a given animal.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬Pa)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4(Qx~2Rx))),(~3Qa),(~3Ra)|=(~3Pa))
## Analysis
1. On what modality is it impossible for animals to value their lives?
- an adjective
2. What is the contradiction on that modality?
- a proposition in conjunction with its negation
3. Can you argue to that contradiction?
- an argument with premises and a conclusion
---
# Hashtags
#debate
#debate_opponents