obsidian/🛡️ Debate/Opponents/Rakhi Sawant.md

1.7 KiB
Executable file
Raw Permalink Blame History

Argument for Eating Animals

Definiendum Definiens
P it is immoral to kill someone (x)
Q someone (x) values their life
R someone (x) has the capacity to value their life
a a given animal
P1) For all things, it is immoral to kill someone if, and only if, someone values their life or someone has the capacity to value their life.
(∀x(Px↔(QxRx)))
P2) A given animal do not value their life.
(¬Qa)
P3) A given animal does not have the capacity to value their life.
(¬Ra)
C) Therefore, it is not immoral to kill a given animal.
(∴¬Pa)

Proof Tree

Analysis

  1. On what modality is it impossible for animals to value their lives?
    • an adjective
  2. What is the contradiction on that modality?
    • a proposition in conjunction with its negation
  3. Can you argue to that contradiction?
    • an argument with premises and a conclusion

Hashtags

#debate #debate_opponents