upRootNutrition/website
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/website.git synced 2025-06-17 04:45:12 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: reformated arguments

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-11-18 15:19:43 -06:00
parent e0fb69d492
commit b3976223fd
10 changed files with 58 additions and 67 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Philosophy/Agnosticism.elm
View file

@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ argumentAgnosticism =
{ argumentTitle = "Agnosticism Consistency Checker"
, propositionTitle = "An interlocutor (who cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition) should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true"
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Uxy~5~3Kxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Kxy~5Wxy)),(~3Uor)%7C=(Wor)"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Pxy~5~3Qxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Qxy~5Rxy)),(~3Por)|=(Ror)"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = "U(x,y)"
[ { definiendum = "P(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on (y)"
}
, { definiendum = "K(x,y)"
, { definiendum = "Q(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) knows why they believe that (y) is true"
}
, { definiendum = "W(x,y)"
, { definiendum = "R(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) should temporarily withhold the belief that (y) is true"
}
, { definiendum = "o"
@ -29,17 +29,17 @@ argumentAgnosticism =
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = "If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true."
, notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Uxy→¬Kxy))"
, notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Pxy→¬Qxy))"
}
, { premise = "If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true."
, notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Kxy→Wxy))"
, notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Qxy→Rxy))"
}
, { premise = "The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand."
, notation = "(¬Uor)"
, notation = "(¬Por)"
}
]
, conclusion = "Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true."
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Wor)"
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Ror)"
}
]
}