website/frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Philosophy/Agnosticism.elm
2024-11-18 15:19:43 -06:00

45 lines
No EOL
2.2 KiB
Elm
Executable file

module Debate.Arguments.Philosophy.Agnosticism exposing (..)
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
argumentAgnosticism : Argument
argumentAgnosticism =
{ argumentTitle = "Agnosticism Consistency Checker"
, propositionTitle = "An interlocutor (who cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition) should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true"
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Pxy~5~3Qxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Qxy~5Rxy)),(~3Por)|=(Ror)"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = "P(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on (y)"
}
, { definiendum = "Q(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) knows why they believe that (y) is true"
}
, { definiendum = "R(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) should temporarily withhold the belief that (y) is true"
}
, { definiendum = "o"
, definiens = "the interlocutor"
}
, { definiendum = "r"
, definiens = "the proposition at hand"
}
]
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = "If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true."
, notation = "(xy(¬Pxy¬Qxy))"
}
, { premise = "If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true."
, notation = "(xy(¬QxyRxy))"
}
, { premise = "The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand."
, notation = "(¬Por)"
}
]
, conclusion = "Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true."
, conclusionNotation = "(Ror)"
}
]
}