feat: reformated arguments

This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-11-18 15:19:43 -06:00
parent e0fb69d492
commit b3976223fd
10 changed files with 58 additions and 67 deletions

View file

@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ argumentAgnosticism =
{ argumentTitle = "Agnosticism Consistency Checker"
, propositionTitle = "An interlocutor (who cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition) should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true"
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Uxy~5~3Kxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Kxy~5Wxy)),(~3Uor)%7C=(Wor)"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Pxy~5~3Qxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Qxy~5Rxy)),(~3Por)|=(Ror)"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = "U(x,y)"
[ { definiendum = "P(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on (y)"
}
, { definiendum = "K(x,y)"
, { definiendum = "Q(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) knows why they believe that (y) is true"
}
, { definiendum = "W(x,y)"
, { definiendum = "R(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) should temporarily withhold the belief that (y) is true"
}
, { definiendum = "o"
@ -29,17 +29,17 @@ argumentAgnosticism =
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = "If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true."
, notation = "(xy(¬Uxy¬Kxy))"
, notation = "(xy(¬Pxy¬Qxy))"
}
, { premise = "If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true."
, notation = "(xy(¬KxyWxy))"
, notation = "(xy(¬QxyRxy))"
}
, { premise = "The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand."
, notation = "(¬Uor)"
, notation = "(¬Por)"
}
]
, conclusion = "Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true."
, conclusionNotation = "(Wor)"
, conclusionNotation = "(Ror)"
}
]
}

View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentAgriculturalPredation =
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Animal Agirculture Counting as Predation"
, propositionTitle = "Animal agriculture counts as predation."
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y~6z(Px~4Qxyz~1(Rxyz~2Sxyz)~1Txyz)),(Qahl),(Rahl~2Sahl),(Tahl)%7C=(Pa)"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y~6z(Px~4Qxyz~1(Rxyz~2Sxyz)~1Wxyz)),(Qahl),(Rahl~2Sahl),(Wahl)%7C=(Pa)"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
, definiens = "(x) counts as predation"
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ argumentAgriculturalPredation =
, { definiendum = "S(x,y,z)"
, definiens = "(x) involves a (y) regularly subduing a (z)"
}
, { definiendum = "T(x,y,z)"
, { definiendum = "W(x,y,z)"
, definiens = "(x) involves a (y) regularly consuming, to the captor's benefit, a (z)"
}
, { definiendum = "a"
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ argumentAgriculturalPredation =
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = "Something counts as predation if, and only if, something involves an animal regularly capturing, killing or subduing, and consuming, to the captor's benefit, another animal."
, notation = "(xyz(PxQxyz(RxyzSxyz)Txyz))"
, notation = "(xyz(PxQxyz(RxyzSxyz)Wxyz))"
}
, { premise = "Animal agriculture involves humans regularly capturing livestock."
, notation = "(Qahl)"
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ argumentAgriculturalPredation =
, notation = "(RahlSahl)"
}
, { premise = "Animal agriculture involves humans regularly consuming, to the captors' benefit, livestock."
, notation = "(Tahl)"
, notation = "(Wahl)"
}
]
, conclusion = "Therefore, animal agriculture counts as predation."