mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 06:35:11 -05:00
5.4 KiB
Executable file
5.4 KiB
Executable file
NTT Reductio (Non-Negated Antecedent w/ Conjunction)
| Definiendum | Definiens |
|---|---|
| T | a being (x) is ethical to consume |
| P | a being (x) has fur |
| Q | a being (x) has horns |
| R | a being (x) has hooves |
| a | hypothetical human |
P1) For all x, where x is a being, they are ethical to consume if, and only if, x has fur, x has horns, and x has hooves.
(∀x(Tx↔(Px∧Qx∧Rx)))
P2) A hypothetical human has fur, horns, and hooves.
(Pa∧Qa∧Ra)
C) Therefore, A hypothetical human is ethical to consume.
(∴Ta)
(∀x(Tx↔(Px∧Qx∧Rx)))
P2) A hypothetical human has fur, horns, and hooves.
(Pa∧Qa∧Ra)
C) Therefore, A hypothetical human is ethical to consume.
(∴Ta)
NTT Reductio (Negated Antecedent w/ Conjunction)
| Definiendum | Definiens |
|---|---|
| T | a being (x) is ethical to consume |
| P | a being (x) has average human intelligence |
| Q | a being (x) has language skills |
| R | a being (x) has human genetics |
| a | hypothetical schmuman |
P1) For all x, where x is a being, they are not ethical to consume if, and only if, x has average human intelligence, x has language skills, and x has human genetics.
(∀x(¬Tx↔(Px∧Qx∧Rx)))
P2) A hypothetical schmuman does not have human genetics.
(¬Ra)
C) Therefore, a hypothetical schmuman is ethical to consume.
(∴Ta)
(∀x(¬Tx↔(Px∧Qx∧Rx)))
P2) A hypothetical schmuman does not have human genetics.
(¬Ra)
C) Therefore, a hypothetical schmuman is ethical to consume.
(∴Ta)
NTT Reductio (Non-Negated Antecedent w/ Disjunction)
| Definiendum | Definiens |
|---|---|
| T | a being (x) is ethical to consume |
| P | a being (x) has fur |
| Q | a being (x) has horns |
| R | a being (x) has hooves |
| a | hypothetical human |
P1) For all x, where x is a being, they are ethical to consume if, and only if, x has fur, or x has horns, or x has hooves.
(∀x(Tx↔(Px∨Qx∨Rx)))
P2) A hypothetical human has hooves.
(Ra)
C) Therefore, A hypothetical human is ethical to consume.
(∴Ta)
(∀x(Tx↔(Px∨Qx∨Rx)))
P2) A hypothetical human has hooves.
(Ra)
C) Therefore, A hypothetical human is ethical to consume.
(∴Ta)
NTT Reductio (Negated Antecedent w/ Disjunction)
| Definiendum | Definiens |
|---|---|
| T | a being (x) is ethical to consume |
| P | a being (x) has average human intelligence |
| Q | a being (x) has language skills |
| R | a being (x) has human genetics |
| a | hypothetical schmuman |
P1) For all x, where x is a being, they are not ethical to consume if, and only if, x has average human intelligence, or x has language skills, or x has human genetics.
(∀x(¬Tx↔(Px∨Qx∨Rx)))
P2) A hypothetical schmuman does not have average human intelligence, language skills, and human genetics.
(¬Pa∧¬Qa∧¬Ra)
C) Therefore, a hypothetical schmuman is ethical to consume.
(∴Ta)
(∀x(¬Tx↔(Px∨Qx∨Rx)))
P2) A hypothetical schmuman does not have average human intelligence, language skills, and human genetics.
(¬Pa∧¬Qa∧¬Ra)
C) Therefore, a hypothetical schmuman is ethical to consume.
(∴Ta)
Hashtags
#debate #debate_coursework #namethetrait #ntt