mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 06:55:12 -05:00
5.5 KiB
Executable file
5.5 KiB
Executable file
Delicious Bivalve Argument
Definiendum | Definiens |
---|---|
B | something (x) counts as a brain |
P | something (x) is a complex network of interconnected neurons |
Q | something (x) integrates neuronal pathways from multiple sensory organs |
R | something (x) presents with distinct functional regions |
S | something (x) presents with nuclei with white matter tracts that facilitate inter-regional communication |
N | the corresponding brainless biological system into which the cerebral ganglia are integrated (x) is not likely to be sentient |
c | cerebral ganglia |
P1) Something counts as a brain if, and only if, something is a complex network of interconnected neurons, integrates neuronal pathways from multiple sensory organs, and presents with distinct functional regions or nuclei with white matter tracts that facilitate inter-regional communication.
(∀x(Bx↔Px∧Qx∧(Rx∨Sx)))
P2) Cerebral ganglia meet criteria one and three, but not criteria two and four.
(Pc∧¬Qc∧Rc∧¬Sc)
P3) If cerebral ganglia do not count as brains, then the corresponding brainless biological system into which the cerebral ganglia are integrated is not likely to be sentient.
(¬Bc→∀x(¬Nx))
C) Therefore, bivalves are not likely to be sentient.
(∴¬Nb)
(∀x(Bx↔Px∧Qx∧(Rx∨Sx)))
P2) Cerebral ganglia meet criteria one and three, but not criteria two and four.
(Pc∧¬Qc∧Rc∧¬Sc)
P3) If cerebral ganglia do not count as brains, then the corresponding brainless biological system into which the cerebral ganglia are integrated is not likely to be sentient.
(¬Bc→∀x(¬Nx))
C) Therefore, bivalves are not likely to be sentient.
(∴¬Nb)
Argument for Bivalve Consumption
Definiendum | Definiens |
---|---|
V | it is vegan to consume (x) lifeform |
S | (x) lifeform does have sentience |
b | bivalves |
P1) If it is not vegan to consume a lifeform, then the lifeform does have sentience.
(∀x(¬Vx→Sx)
P2) Bivalves do not have sentience.
(¬Sb)
C) Therefore, it is vegan to consume bivalves.
(∴Vb)
(∀x(¬Vx→Sx)
P2) Bivalves do not have sentience.
(¬Sb)
C) Therefore, it is vegan to consume bivalves.
(∴Vb)
Ecological Harm Tho
Variable | Definition |
---|---|
F | the food is OK to eat |
H | the food does cause ecological harm |
s | soy |
P1) If the food is OK to eat, then the food does not cause ecological harm.
(∀x(Fx→¬Hx))
P2) Soy does cause ecological harm.
(Hs)
C) Therefore, soy is not OK to eat.
(∴¬Fs)
(∀x(Fx→¬Hx))
P2) Soy does cause ecological harm.
(Hs)
C) Therefore, soy is not OK to eat.
(∴¬Fs)
Ganglia Tho Hypothetical
For example, say we had a braindead body on life support, and some people (like loved ones) who would experience emotional well-being if you took them off life support. Would you say "screw their emotions, we should apply the precautionary principle to that body's cerebral ganglia". I personally wouldn't. I'd take the wishes of those people to supersede keeping the ganglia alive. Likewise, I can't think of a good reason to deny people well-being from eating oysters.
Links
Biomass Distribution
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1711842115
Tumour Case Report
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28042664/
Mollusc Sentience
📂 Media/PDFs/sentience-in-cephalopod-molluscs-and-decapod-crustaceans-final-report-november-2021.pdf
Hashtags
#vegan #philosophy #sentience #bivalves