obsidian/🛡️ Debate/Arguments/Philosophy/Agnosticism.md

2.1 KiB
Executable file

Agnosticism Argument

Variable Definition
U one (x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition (y)
K one (x) knows why they believe that a proposition (y) is true
W one (x) should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition (y) is true
o the interlocutor
r the proposition at hand
P1) If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true.
(∀x∀y(¬Uxy→¬Kxy))
P2) If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true.
(∀x∀y(¬Kxy→Wxy))
P3) The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand.
(¬Uor)
C) Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true.
(∴Wor)

Proof Tree

Hashtags

#arguments #philosophy #debate