mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 15:45:11 -05:00
34 lines
No EOL
1.1 KiB
Markdown
Executable file
34 lines
No EOL
1.1 KiB
Markdown
Executable file
### Trans-Skepticism Argument
|
|
|
|
<div style="text-align: center">
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>P1)</b></font> If there is not a known symmetry-breaker between identified, transitioned trans people and identified, de-transitioned trans people, then we do not have epistemic access to the means of parsing legitimate trans people from illegitimate trans people.
|
|
<br />
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>(¬P→¬Q)</b>
|
|
<br />
|
|
<b>P2)</b></font> If we do not have epistemic access to the means of parsing legitimate trans people from illegitimate trans people, then there is not a clear epistemically virtuous reason to accept the legitimacy of trans identity.
|
|
<br />
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>(¬Q→¬R)</b>
|
|
<br />
|
|
<b>P3)</b></font> There is not a known symmetry-breaker between identified, transitioned trans people and identified, de-transitioned trans people.
|
|
<br />
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>(¬P)</b>
|
|
<br />
|
|
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, there is not a clear epistemically virtuous reason to accept the legitimacy of trans identity.
|
|
<br />
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>(∴¬R)</b>
|
|
<br />
|
|
<br />
|
|
</font>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Hashtag
|
|
|
|
#debate
|
|
#arguments |