mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 17:05:12 -05:00
128 lines
No EOL
4 KiB
Markdown
Executable file
128 lines
No EOL
4 KiB
Markdown
Executable file
# Debate 2
|
|
|
|
## Proposition
|
|
|
|
>"Nick believes:
|
|
> 1) "
|
|
|
|
## Analysis
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
## Semantics
|
|
|
|
| **Definiendum** | **Definiens** |
|
|
|:---------------:|:-------------:|
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
## Clarified Proposition
|
|
|
|
>""
|
|
|
|
## Receipts
|
|
|
|
![[Pasted image 20241104170500.png]]
|
|
![[Pasted image 20241104170436.png]]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Permissible Dog-Stomping Reductio
|
|
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**Definiendum**</font> | <font color="CC6600">**Definiens**</font> |
|
|
|:-------------------------------------------:|:--------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**P(y)**</font> | animal (y) is property |
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**Q(x,y)**</font> | committing harm (x) against animal (y) is permissible |
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**x**</font> | committing harm against (an animal) |
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**y**</font> | an animal |
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**d**</font> | a stray dog (y) |
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**s**</font> | Peanut the squirrel (y) |
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**m**</font> | stomping in the head of (an animal) (x) |
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**t**</font> | euthanizing (x) |
|
|
|
|
<div style="text-align: center">
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>P1)</b></font> For all things, committing harm (x) against animal (y) is permissible if, and only if, the animal (y) is not property.
|
|
<br />
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>(∀x∀y(Qxy↔¬Py))</b>
|
|
<br />
|
|
<b>P2)</b></font> A stray dog is not property and Peanut the squirrel is property.
|
|
<br />
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>(¬Pd∧Ps)</b>
|
|
<br />
|
|
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, stomping in the head of a stray dog is permissible and euthanizing Peanut the squirrel is not permissible.
|
|
<br />
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|
<b>(∴Qmd∧¬Qts)</b>
|
|
<br />
|
|
<br />
|
|
</font>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Debate 1
|
|
|
|
## Proposition
|
|
|
|
>"That carnivore/hyper-carnivore is best for optimal human health and is ethically appropriate."
|
|
|
|
## Analysis
|
|
1. what does "carnivore/hyper-carnivore" mean? If this is an inclusive disjunction, whichever diet is "less" carnivorous than the other will be one being argued for.
|
|
- ""
|
|
2. what does "ethically appropriate" mean? What sort of ethics (rights, utility, rules?), Appropriate with regards to what?
|
|
- ""
|
|
|
|
## Clarified Proposition 1
|
|
|
|
>"Red muscle meat diet with some bone marrow and salt supplies the nutrients that humans need to develop."
|
|
|
|
## Clarified Proposition 2
|
|
|
|
>"Red muscle meat diet with some bone marrow and salt is not shame-worthy."
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Clarified Proposition 3
|
|
|
|
>"Red muscle meat diet with some bone marrow and salt lacks phytochemicals that cause damage to the human body."
|
|
|
|
## Line of Questioning:
|
|
|
|
### What's the evidence?
|
|
|
|
1. Animal nutrients not found in plants
|
|
- Lack of animal foods causes nutritional deficiencies
|
|
- Brain size decreases with agriculture **(not evidence)**
|
|
2. Phytochemicals in plants
|
|
- Pesticides in plants are carcinogenic **(not evidence)**
|
|
3. Limited adaptations for eating plants
|
|
- Don't see carnivores benefitting from plants
|
|
4. Plants want to defend themselves with chemicals
|
|
5. Many anecdotes count in favour of the carnivore **(not evidence)**
|
|
6. Blue zones eat a lot of meat and live the longest **(not evidence)**
|
|
7. Carnivorous animals don't thrive on herbivorous diets **(not evidence)**
|
|
8. The removal of fibre could help constipation
|
|
- We can only break down a small amount of the fibre
|
|
9. RCTs show that animal fat is superior to plant fat
|
|
- MCE, SDHS, WHI **(not evidence)**
|
|
10. Paleolithic humans had the same life span as modern humans despite not having access to modern medicine **(not evidence)**
|
|
- Maasi live to be over 100 **(not evidence)**
|
|
11. Harvard carnivore study **(not evidence)**
|
|
|
|
## Cherry on top
|
|
|
|
Whatever he says, ask him if he would accept the same for X diet
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Hashtags
|
|
|
|
#debate
|
|
#debate_opponents
|
|
#clowns
|
|
#clownery
|
|
#carnivore
|
|
#philosophy |