mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 23:25:13 -05:00
1.8 KiB
Executable file
1.8 KiB
Executable file
Debate 1
Melina's Animal Advocacy Argument
| Definiendum | Definiens |
|---|---|
| P | action (x) extracts pleasure from a sentient being (y) at its expense |
| M | action (x) is morally wrong |
| c | cows |
| d | dogs |
| e | eating cows |
| f | fucking dogs |
P1) If an action extracts pleasure from a sentient being at its expense, then such an action is morally wrong.
(∀x∀y(Pxy→Mx))
P2) Eating cows extracts pleasure from cows at their expense.
(Pec)
P3) Fucking dogs extracts pleasure from dogs at their expense.
(Pfd)
C) Therefore, eating cows and fucking dogs is morally wrong.
(∴Me∧Mf)
(∀x∀y(Pxy→Mx))
P2) Eating cows extracts pleasure from cows at their expense.
(Pec)
P3) Fucking dogs extracts pleasure from dogs at their expense.
(Pfd)
C) Therefore, eating cows and fucking dogs is morally wrong.
(∴Me∧Mf)
Hashtags
#debate #debate_opponents #vegan #ntt