mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 23:25:13 -05:00
69 lines
831 B
Markdown
69 lines
831 B
Markdown
# Debate 1
|
|
|
|
## Proposition
|
|
>Animal products are inherently unhealthy
|
|
|
|
## Semantic Analysis
|
|
1. "inherently"
|
|
1. necessary
|
|
1. modal
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
### Unclear Terms
|
|
1. "inherently"
|
|
2. "unhealthy"
|
|
|
|
## Clarified Proposition
|
|
>Animal foods tend to cause harm
|
|
|
|
## Questions
|
|
1. "unhealthy"
|
|
2. "detrimental"
|
|
1. tending to cause harm
|
|
|
|
1. mechanisms tho
|
|
1.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Debate 2
|
|
|
|
## Proposition
|
|
>Industry funding is a good reason to just dismiss studies regardless
|
|
|
|
## Semantic Analysis
|
|
|
|
### Unclear Terms
|
|
1. "good"
|
|
2. "dismiss"
|
|
|
|
## Clarified Proposition
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
## Questions
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Debate 3
|
|
|
|
## Proposition
|
|
>Animal products and refined food use is risky because it can encourage habituation
|
|
|
|
## Semantic Analysis
|
|
|
|
### Unclear Terms
|
|
1. "habituation"
|
|
2. "risky"
|
|
|
|
## Clarified Proposition
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
## Questions
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Hashtags
|
|
|
|
#debate
|
|
#debate_opponents
|