obsidian/🛡️ Debate/🗡️ Opponents/Cuck Truck.md
2024-06-28 02:13:12 -05:00

19 KiB
Raw Blame History

Debate Invitations and Responses

Ken Berry

  • Social: KenDBerryMD
  • Circumstances: Multiple debate invitations extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended and dodged via X. Link
    2. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Cliff Harvey

  • Social: CarbAppropriate
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation accepted via email and later declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Diana Rodgers

  • Social: sustainabledish
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via Instagram and presumed declined due to being deleted.
  • Evidence: Link

Dave Feldman

  • Social: DaveKeto
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation conditionally accepted via X and later declined.
  • Evidence: Link

Cate Shanahan

  • Social: drcateshanahan
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    2. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    3. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    4. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Paul Mason

  • Social: DrPaulMason
  • Circumstances: Nominated for debate with no follow-up.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    2. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Ivor Cummins

  • Social: FatEmperor
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation declined via X. Link

Paul Saladino

  • Social: paulsaladinomd
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    2. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    3. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    4. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    5. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    6. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Kyle Mamounis

  • Social: Nutricrinology
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X but disengaged once cornered.
  • Evidence: Link

Tucker Goodrich

  • Social: TuckerGoodrich
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and blocked when cornered.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation accepted via X and subsequently declined before blocking. Link
    2. Debate invitation declined via X. Link
    3. All further debate invitations preemptively declined via X. Link

Amber O'Hearn

  • Social: KetoCarnivore
  • Circumstances: Discussion invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Mike Mutzel

  • Social: MikeMutzel
  • Circumstances: Challenged an egregious assertion and was ignored.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Tro Kalayjian

  • Social: DoctorTro
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and dodged repeatedly before blocking.
  • Evidence: Link

Zoe Harcombe

  • Social: zoeharcombe
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Ann Childers

  • Social: AnnChildersMD
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and repeatedly dodged when pressed for specifics.
  • Evidence: Link

James DiNicolantonio

  • Social: drjamesdinic
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Ralph Napolitano

  • Social: DrRalphNap
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Michael Kummer

  • Social: mkummer82
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link

Kem Minnick

  • Social: kemminnick
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation accepted via X with no follow-up.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Engaged in written debate via X and blocked when cornered. Link

Travis Statham

  • Social: Travis_Statham
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via Reddit and ignored.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation declined via YouTube comments section. Link
    2. Debate invitation extended via Reddit with no response. Link

Raphael Sirtoli

  • Social: raphaels7
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. All further debate invitations preemptively declined via X. Link

Justin Mares

  • Social: jwmares
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and dodged when pressed for specifics.
  • Evidence: Link

Anthony Gustin

  • Social: dranthonygustin
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation accepted via X with no follow-up.
  • Evidence: Link

Jake Mey

  • Social: CakeNutrition
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and dodged when cornered.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation declined via X. Link
    2. Imaginary debate invite preemptively declined via X. Link

Max Lugavere

  • Social: maxlugavere
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and dodged when pressed for specifics.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    2. Debate invitation declined via X. Link

Tristan Haggard

  • Social: Trxstxn4
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X and presumed declined due to repeated dodges.
  • Evidence: Link

Joseph Everett

  • Social: JEverettLearned
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Brad Campbell

  • Social: DrBradCampbell
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Kevin Stock

  • Social: kevinstock12
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Carnivore Aurelius

  • Social: AlpacaAurelius
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Bart Kay

Nick Eggleton

  • Social: NickEggleton
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link

Marty Kendall

  • Social: martykendall2
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and blocked when cornered.
  • Evidence: Link

Rob Meijer

  • Social: EngineerDiet
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and repeatedly dodged when pressed for specifics.
  • Evidence: Link

Ashwani Garg

  • Social: agargmd
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and repeatedly dodged when cornered.
  • Evidence: Link

Brian Kerley

  • Social: SeedOilDsrspctr
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Adam Pollock

  • Social: aIIegoricaI
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link

Kait Malthaner

  • Social: healthcoachkait
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Michael Manderville

  • Social: MikeManderville
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and dodged when pressed for specifics.
  • Evidence: Link

Philip Ovadia

  • Social: ifixhearts
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Nina Teicholz

  • Social: bigfatsurprise
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link
    2. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Norstrong Chris

  • Social: NNMChris
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and repeatedly dodged when cornered.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation declined via X. Link
    2. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Clemens Zsófia

  • Social: ClemensZsofia
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Elie Jarrouge

  • Social: ElieJarrougeMD
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

David Gornoski

Mark Sisson

  • Social: Mark_Sisson
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Adam Singer

  • Social: AdamSinger
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Benny Malone

  • Social: bennymaloneUK
  • Circumstances: Engaged in written debate via X and dodged when pressed for specifics.
  • Evidence: Link

David Diamond

  • Social: LDLSkeptic
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. All further debate invitations preemptively declined via X. Link

Ben Bikman

  • Social: BenBikmanPhD
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link

Gary Taubes

  • Social: garytaubes
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link

Robb Wolf

  • Social: robbwolf
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link

Eric Sartori

  • Social: CarnAtheist
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via X.
  • Evidence: Link

Tart Vader

  • Discord: User Profile
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation declined via Discord.
  • Evidence: 🌱┃veganism

Brian Kateman

  • Social: BrianKateman
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation accepted and subsequently declined via email.
  • Evidence: Link

Edward Goeke

  • Social: GoekeEddie
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X with no response.
  • Evidence: Link
  • Repeat Offenses:
    1. Debate invitation extended via X with no response. Link

Mike Sweeney

  • Social: thelowcarb_rd
  • Circumstances: Debate invitation extended via X and presumed declined due to blocking.
  • Evidence: Link