mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-16 07:15:12 -05:00
40 lines
No EOL
919 B
Markdown
Executable file
40 lines
No EOL
919 B
Markdown
Executable file
# Debate 1
|
|
|
|
## Debate Proposition:
|
|
|
|
> "Vegans wish to abolish and criminalize animal agriculture, however, the crop agriculture relied upon by vegans is more unethical than the animal agriculture relied upon by non-vegans."
|
|
|
|
>"There is dissonance between vegan values and the knowledge vegans possess?
|
|
|
|
1. Is the claim that vegans are hypocrites?
|
|
- Refuses to answer the question.
|
|
2. What is meant by unethical?
|
|
-
|
|
3. What is the argument that crop ag is less ethical than non-crop ag?
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
## Reference:
|
|
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ecog.05126
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Debate 2
|
|
|
|
## Proposition
|
|
>Nick is in favour of intentionally disrupting ecosystems.
|
|
|
|
## Analysis
|
|
1. **Intentionally disrupt** just means I'm in favour of non-violent displacement of wild animals.
|
|
1. Don't disagree with the proposition.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Hashtags
|
|
|
|
#debate
|
|
#debate_opponents
|
|
#vegan
|
|
#cropdeaths
|
|
#low_carb_talking_points
|
|
#clowns
|
|
#clownery |