obsidian/🛡️ Debate/Opponents/redwildboi33.md

2.5 KiB
Executable file

Debate 3

Proposition

"On Nick's definition it is and is not the case that Nick is Intentionally conspiring to cause harm."

Notes

Conceded he was a gibberish generator !

Debate 2

Proposition

"Veganism is attacking food security."

Argument

P1) In order to be secure in our existence, we need food.
(A)
P2) There are finite amounts of resources.
(B)
P3) Population expansion is at 67 million (with a 2% multiplier) annually.
(C)
P4) Humans have morphological characteristics that inhibit us from digesting unlockable carbs such as langan and cellulose.
(D)
P5) 70% of the global surface is water.
(E)
P6) There is no structure for monocropping on water bodies.
(F)
P7) There are waste products involved in animal agriculture.
(G)
P8) 86% of waste manufacture products are fed back to livestock.
(H)
P9) The waste products are not fit for human consumption.
(I)
P10) Pigs cecums are longer than human rectums.
(J)
P11) Poultry gizzards can absorb more mineral content than humans.
(K)
P12) The phosphorous that poultry can absorb would kill a human.
(L)
P13) Copper is deadly to sheep.
(M)
C) Therefore, veganism is attacking food security.
(∴N)

Proof Tree

Debate 2

Proposition

"The international case studies are conclusive in their findings that dairy maximizes growth potential"

Analysis

  1. same attitude toward the relationship between smoking and longevity?
    1. if no, why?

Hashtags

#debate #debate_opponents #clowns #clownery #environment #vegan