mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 15:55:13 -05:00
1,016 B
Executable file
1,016 B
Executable file
Debate 2
Proposition
"cows can't live if humans don't eat them."
Analysis
- on what modality?
- what's the contradiction?
- can you infer to that contradiction?
- if not a modal claim, what is even being said?
Debate 1
Proposition
"animal agriculture is morally superior because future cows want to live."
Argument
P1) If future cows will want to live, then future cows will be bred.
(P→Q)
P2) Future cows will want to live.
(P)
C) Therefore, future cows will be bred.
(∴Q)
(P→Q)
P2) Future cows will want to live.
(P)
C) Therefore, future cows will be bred.
(∴Q)
Analysis
- What the fuck does it mean for a non-existent being to want something?
Hashtags
#debate #debate_opponents #clowns #clownery #vegan #agriculture #animal_agriculture