upRootNutrition/obsidian
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git synced 2025-06-16 06:35:13 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: reorganized hyperblog and added vitamin D paper

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-09-26 12:48:46 -05:00
parent 0fe545c254
commit e22bd788fe
167 changed files with 235 additions and 98 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

78
🛡️ Debate/Arguments/Metaethics/Companions in Guilt.md Executable file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
### Companions in Guilt
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If error theory is true then there are no categorical moral norms.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P→¬Q)</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> If there are no square-circle norms, then there are no categorical epistemic norms.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬Q→¬R)</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> There are categorical epistemic norms.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(R)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, error theory is false and there are categorical moral norms.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬P∧Q)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5~3Q),(~3Q~5~3R),(R)|=(~3P~1Q))
---
### Companions in Guilt Interpretation
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If error theory is true then there are no square-circle norms.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P→¬Q)</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> If there are no square-circle norms, then there are no circle-square norms.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬Q→¬R)</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> There are circle-square norms.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(R)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, error theory is false and there are square-circle norms.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬P∧Q)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5~3Q),(~3Q~5~3R),(R)|=(~3P~1Q))
---
| Moral Norm | Epistemic Norm | Judgement |
| ------------ | -------------- | ------------ |
| categorical | categorical | gibberish |
| categorical | hypothetical | equivocation |
| hypothetical | categorical | equivocation |
| hypothetical | hypothetical | agree |
---
# Hashtags
#moral_realism
#philosophy

13
🛡️ Debate/Arguments/Metaethics/Drowning Child.md Executable file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
## Tit-Gazing Case Reductio
>Bob is walking home from work one day when he sees a lifelike statue of a woman with pair of shapely, double-D breasts inside a nearby park. Bob can stop to admire the breasts, and he knows that the experience would be very exciting. However, Bob is not wearing his glasses and does not have enough time to enter the park. In order to fully appreciate the breasts he will have to squint and be momentarily uncomfortable. Should Bob gaze upon the breasts as he passes by?
>
>The Tit-Gazing case is aesthetically compelling because we seem to be able to see, without argument, that we ought to stop and admire the breasts. If this is right, then the judgment that we ought to admire the breasts cannot be based on some contingent social or psychological fact about us. Rather, it seems that the claim that we ought to admire the breasts is an objective aesthetic truth that exists independently of our beliefs or desires. This is evidence in favour of aesthetic realism, the view that there are objective aesthetic facts that are true independently of us and our beliefs.
---
## Hashtags
#philosophy
#moral_realism
#sexuality