feat: added argument

🛡️ Debate/🗡️ Opponents/Ed Goeke.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Debate 1
+
+## Proposition
+
+>"hyperbetalipoproteinemia doesn't cause ASCVD"
+
+## Analysis
+
+1. 
+
+## Clarified Proposition
+
+>""
+
+## Semantics
+
+1. 
+
+## Receipts
+
+---
+
+# Hashtags
+
+#debate 
+#clowns 
+#debate_opponents 
+#clownery 
+#LDL 
+#heart_disease 

🛡️ Debate/🗡️ Opponents/Tysca.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# Debate 1
+
+## Proposition
+
+~~>"genetically engineering humans is bad?"~~
+~~>"improving humanity through genetic alteration is bad?"~~
+
+## Analysis
+
+1. Is this in principle? Meaning all else equal?
+	1. For example, let's say that we have two possible worlds that are equal, but in one world a human is genetically altered with at least one benefit to them and/or the people around them. Which world is better?
+		1. If genetic alternation world is better, you're not against it in principle.
+		2. If the "wildtype" world is better, then you're just crazy.
+
+Didn't disagree with my view.
+
+---
+
+# Hashtags
+
+#debate 
+#debate_opponents