website/frontend/src/Config/Pages/Debate/Arguments/Inferences/EthicalSlurs.elm
2024-12-09 19:53:09 -06:00

60 lines
3.3 KiB
Elm
Executable file
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

module Config.Pages.Debate.Arguments.Inferences.EthicalSlurs exposing (..)
import Config.Pages.Debate.Arguments.Types exposing (..)
argumentEthicalSlurs : Argument
argumentEthicalSlurs =
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Using the Term Retard"
, propositionTitle = "It is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning."
, propositionReductio = ""
, propositionSummary = "The only historical examples of bigoted terms, such as slurs, becoming non-harmful to the demographics toward which they were historically targeted involve literally changing the usage of the term to something non-bigoted. I dont see any historical precedent for a methodology that has been as successful in achieving this goal as altering the term's usage. Such as using the term \"nigga\" to mean \"friend\", for example."
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(~6x(~3Px~5Rx)),(~3Pr),(~3Qr~1Rr~5Sr),(Sr~5Wr)|=(Wr)"
, argumentCertainty = 7
, argumentImage = "ethicalslurs"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
, definiens = "(x)'s negative connotations have been neutralised"
}
, { definiendum = "Q(x)"
, definiens = "(x) has been rendered non-bigoted via altered usage"
}
, { definiendum = "R(x)"
, definiens = "oppressed people will continue to suffer from the use of (x)"
}
, { definiendum = "S(x)"
, definiens = "it is permissible to neutralise the term retard's negative connotations"
}
, { definiendum = "W(x)"
, definiens = "it is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning"
}
, { definiendum = "x"
, definiens = "a slur"
}
, { definiendum = "r"
, definiens = "retard"
}
]
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = "For all slurs, a slur's negative connotations have been neutralised if, and only if, slur has been rendered non-bigoted via altered usage."
, notation = "x(PxQx)"
}
, { premise = "For all slurs, if it is not the case that slur's negative connotations have been neutralised, then oppressed people will continue to suffer from the use of slur."
, notation = "x(¬PxRx)"
}
, { premise = "It is not the case that the term retard's negative connotations have been neutralised."
, notation = "¬Pr"
}
, { premise = "If the term retard has not been rendered non-bigoted via altered usage and oppressed people will continue to suffer from the use of the term retard, then it is permissible to neutralise the term retard's negative connotations."
, notation = "¬QrRrSr"
}
, { premise = "If it is permissible to neutralise the term retard's negative connotations, then It is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning."
, notation = "SrWr"
}
]
, conclusion = "Therefore, it is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning."
, conclusionNotation = "Wr"
}
]
}