website/frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Science/EpidemiologyCausality.elm
2024-11-19 12:22:23 -06:00

40 lines
1.7 KiB
Elm
Executable file

module Debate.Arguments.Science.EpidemiologyCausality exposing (..)
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
argumentEpidemiologyCausality : Argument
argumentEpidemiologyCausality =
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Nutritional Epidemiology"
, propositionTitle = "Nutritional epidemiology generally provides good causal estimates."
, propositionReductio = ""
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5Qx)),(Pe)|=(Qe)"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
, definiens = "(x) consistently identifies associations that are later confirmed by randomized controlled trials"
}
, { definiendum = "Q(x)"
, definiens = "(x) generally provides good causal estimates"
}
, { definiendum = "x"
, definiens = "a research method"
}
, { definiendum = "e"
, definiens = "nutritional epidemiology"
}
]
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = "For all things, if a research method consistently identifies associations that are later confirmed by randomized controlled trials, then the research method generally provides good causal estimates."
, notation = "(x(PxQx))"
}
, { premise = "Nutritional epidemiology consistently identifies associations that are later confirmed by randomized controlled trials."
, notation = "(P)e"
}
]
, conclusion = "Therefore, nutritional epidemiology generally provides good causal estimates."
, conclusionNotation = "(Qe)"
}
]
}