module Debate.Arguments.Philosophy.Agnosticism exposing (..) import Debate.Types exposing (..) argumentAgnosticism : Argument argumentAgnosticism = { argumentTitle = "Agnosticism Consistency Checker" , propositionTitle = "An interlocutor (who cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition) should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true" , propositionSummary = "Summary" , proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Uxy~5~3Kxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Kxy~5Wxy)),(~3Uor)%7C=(Wor)" , definitionTable = [ { definiendum = "U(x,y)" , definiens = "(x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on (y)" } , { definiendum = "K(x,y)" , definiens = "(x) knows why they believe that (y) is true" } , { definiendum = "W(x,y)" , definiens = "(x) should temporarily withhold the belief that (y) is true" } , { definiendum = "o" , definiens = "the interlocutor" } , { definiendum = "r" , definiens = "the proposition at hand" } ] , argumentFormalization = [ { premises = [ { premise = "If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true." , notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Uxy→¬Kxy))" } , { premise = "If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true." , notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Kxy→Wxy))" } , { premise = "The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand." , notation = "(¬Uor)" } ] , conclusion = "Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true." , conclusionNotation = "(∴Wor)" } ] }