module Debate.Arguments.Agnosticism exposing (..) import Debate.Types exposing (..) argumentAgnosticism : Argument argumentAgnosticism = { argumentTitle = "Agnosticism Consistency Checker" , propositionTitle = "An interlocutor (who cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition) should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true." , propositionReductio = "" , propositionSummary = "Summary" , proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Pxy~5~3Qxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Qxy~5Rxy)),(~3Por)|=(Ror)" , definitionTable = [ { definiendum = "P(x,y)" , definiens = "(x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on (y)" } , { definiendum = "Q(x,y)" , definiens = "(x) knows why they believe that (y) is true" } , { definiendum = "R(x,y)" , definiens = "(x) should temporarily withhold the belief that (y) is true" } , { definiendum = "x" , definiens = "a person" } , { definiendum = "y" , definiens = "a proposition" } , { definiendum = "o" , definiens = "the interlocutor" } , { definiendum = "r" , definiens = "the proposition at hand" } ] , argumentFormalization = [ { premises = [ { premise = "If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true." , notation = "∀x∀y(¬Pxy→¬Qxy)" } , { premise = "If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true." , notation = "∀x∀y(¬Qxy→Rxy)" } , { premise = "The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand." , notation = "(¬Por)" } ] , conclusion = "Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true." , conclusionNotation = "Ror" } ] }