feat: refactored a shit ton of stuff

frontend/src/Config/Pages/Debate/Arguments/Inferences/AnimalRights.elm

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+module Config.Pages.Debate.Arguments.Inferences.AnimalRights exposing (..)
+
+import Config.Pages.Debate.Arguments.Types exposing (..)
+
+
+argumentAnimalRights : Argument
+argumentAnimalRights =
+    { argumentTitle = "Argument for Animal Rights"
+    , propositionTitle = "We should not exploit animals to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans."
+    , propositionReductio = ""
+    , propositionSummary = "I view animal rights as the logical extension of trait-adjusted human rights to non-human animals. As such, if one wants to deny that animals should be given these trait-adjusted rights, they'll have to name a trait that accounts for the differential normative evaluation. Typically this is done by rejecting P3 and saying something retarded."
+    , proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5~3Qx)),(~3Pa~5~7t(Rta~5(Rth~5~3Ph))),(~3~7t(Rta~5(Rth~5~3Ph))),(Pa)|=(~3Qa)"
+    
+    , argumentCertainty = 10
+    , argumentImage = "animalrights"
+    , definitionTable =
+        [ { definiendum = "P(x)"
+          , definiens = "(x) has moral worth"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "Q(x)"
+          , definiens = "we should exploit (x) to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans"
+          }
+           , { definiendum = "R(t,x)"
+          , definiens = "there exists a (t) that is absent in (x)"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a being"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "t"
+          , definiens = "trait"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "a"
+          , definiens = "animal"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "h"
+          , definiens = "human"
+          }
+        ]
+    , argumentFormalization =
+        [ { premises =
+                [ { premise = "For all things, if a being has moral worth, then we should not exploit it to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans."
+                  , notation = "∀x(Px→¬Qx)"
+                  }
+                , { premise = "If animals don’t have moral worth, then there exists a trait that is absent in animals such that if it were absent in humans, humans wouldn’t have moral worth."
+                  , notation = "¬Pa→∃t(Rta→(Rth→¬Ph))"
+                  }
+                , { premise = "There doesn’t exist a trait that is absent in animals such that if it were absent in humans, humans wouldn’t have moral worth"
+                  , notation = "¬∃t(Rta→(Rth→¬Ph))"
+                  }
+                ]
+          , conclusion = "Therefore, we should not exploit animals to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans."
+          , conclusionNotation = "¬Qa"
+          }
+        ]
+    }