feat: reformatted arguments

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/DietaryCholesterol.elm

@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ argumentDietaryCholesterol =
           }
         , { definiendum = "Q(x)"
           , definiens = "(x) increases heart disease risk"
+          }
+              , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a substance"
           }
         , { definiendum = "d"
           , definiens = "dietary cholesterol"

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/HealthyFattyFish.elm

@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ argumentHealthyFattyFish =
         , { definiendum = "Q(x)"
           , definiens = "(x) consistently associates with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates"
           }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a food"
+          }
         , { definiendum = "f"
           , definiens = "fatty fish"
           }

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/HealthyFibre.elm

@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ argumentHealthyFibre =
         , { definiendum = "Q(x)"
           , definiens = "(x) consistently associates with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates"
           }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a food"
+          }
         , { definiendum = "b"
           , definiens = "fibre"
           }

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/HealthyFood.elm

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ argumentHealthyFood =
     , propositionTitle = "Pepsi is healthy compared to leafy greens when trapped on a desert island."
     , propositionReductio = ""
     , propositionSummary = "A food is considered healthier than another in a specific context if it increases the time before illness or disease sets in when replacing the other food. On a desert island, since Pepsi can extend the time before starvation compared to leafy greens, it is considered healthier than leafy greens in that context."
-    , proofLink  = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y~6z~6w(Pxyw~4Qxyzw)),(Qpdsl)%7C=(Ppdl)"
+    , proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y~6z~6w(Pxyw~4Qwxzy)),(Qdpsl)|=(Ppld)"
     , definitionTable =
         [ { definiendum = "P(x,y,w)"
           , definiens = "a given (x) is healthy compared to a given (w) when in a given (y)"
@@ -17,6 +17,18 @@ argumentHealthyFood =
         , { definiendum = "Q(x,y,z,w)"
           , definiens = "when within a (y) the consumption of the given (x) is likely to increase the lag-time to the onset of (z) when replacing a given (w)"
           }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a food"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "y"
+          , definiens = "a another food"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "z"
+          , definiens = "an illness or disease"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "w"
+          , definiens = "a context"
+          }
         , { definiendum = "p"
           , definiens = "Pepsi"
           }
@@ -32,15 +44,15 @@ argumentHealthyFood =
         ]
     , argumentFormalization =
         [ { premises =
-                [ { premise = "A given food is healthy compared to another given food when in a given context if, and only if, when within that context the consumption of that given food is likely to increase the lag-time to the onset of illness, disease, or infirmity when replacing a given other food."
+                [ { premise = "A given food (x) is healthy compared to another given food (y) when in a given context (w) if, and only if, when within that context (w) the consumption of that given food (x) is likely to increase the lag-time to the onset of illness, disease, or infirmity (z) when replacing a given other food (y)."
-                  , notation = "(∀x∀y∀z∀w(Pxyw↔Qxyzw))"
+                  , notation = "(∀x∀y∀z∀w(Pxyw↔Qwxzy))"
                   }
                 , { premise = "When trapped on a desert island the consumption of Pepsi increases the lag-time to the onset of starvation when replacing leafy greens."
-                  , notation = "(Qpdsl)"
+                  , notation = "(Qdpsl)"
                   }
                 ]
           , conclusion = "Therefore, Pepsi is healthy compared to leafy greens when trapped on a desert island."
-          , conclusionNotation = "(∴Ppdl)"
+          , conclusionNotation = "(∴Ppld)"
           }
         ]
     }

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/Malondialdehyde.elm

@@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ argumentMalondialdehyde =
           }
         , { definiendum = "R(x)"
           , definiens = "all (x) are atherogenic"
+          }
+             , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a substance"
+          }
+                 , { definiendum = "y"
+          , definiens = "malondialdehyde-producing fatty acids"
           }
         , { definiendum = "m"
           , definiens = "malondialdehyde"
@@ -29,14 +35,14 @@ argumentMalondialdehyde =
         ]
     , argumentFormalization =
         [ { premises =
-                [ { premise = "Something increases the risk of atherosclerosis if and only if something facilitates the oxidative modification of LDL particles."
+                [ { premise = "A substance (x) increases the risk of atherosclerosis if and only if that substance (x) facilitates the oxidative modification of LDL particles."
                   , notation = "(∀x(Px↔Qx))"
                   }
                 , { premise = "Malondialdehyde facilitates the oxidative modification of LDL particles."
                   , notation = "(Qm)"
                   }
                 , { premise = "If malondialdehyde increases the risk of atherosclerosis, then all malondialdehyde-producing fatty acids are atherogenic."
-                  , notation = "(Pm→∀x(Rx))"
+                  , notation = "(Pm→∀y(Ry))"
                   }
                 ]
           , conclusion = "Therefore, omega-3s are atherogenic."

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/SodiumCVD.elm

@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ argumentSodiumCVD =
           }
         , { definiendum = "R(x)"
           , definiens = "higher intakes of substance (x) increases cardiovascular disease risk"
+          }
+              , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a substance"
           }
         , { definiendum = "s"
           , definiens = "sodium"
@@ -25,7 +28,7 @@ argumentSodiumCVD =
         ]
     , argumentFormalization =
         [ { premises =
-                [ { premise = "For all things, if substance (x) consistently raises blood pressure in controlled studies and elevated blood pressure is known to cause cardiovascular disease, then higher intakes of substance (x) increases cardiovascular disease risk."
+                [ { premise = "For all things, if a substance (x) consistently raises blood pressure in controlled studies and elevated blood pressure is known to cause cardiovascular disease, then higher intakes of that substance (x) increases cardiovascular disease risk."
                   , notation = "(∀x(Px∧Q→Rx))"
                   }
                 , { premise = "Sodium consistently raises blood pressure in controlled studies."

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/UnhealthyCoconutOil.elm

@@ -20,13 +20,16 @@ argumentUnhealthyCoconutOil =
         , { definiendum = "R"
           , definiens = "there is a reason to believe that such an (x) is any better for heart health than other (x) that increase LDL-C"
           }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a saturated fat source"
+          }
         , { definiendum = "c"
           , definiens = "coconut oil"
           }
         ]
     , argumentFormalization =
         [ { premises =
-                [ { premise = "If a given saturated fat source increases LDL-C at a similar rate to other saturated fat sources and and a given saturated fat source has no other known qualities that counteract said increase in LDL-C, then there is not a reason to believe that such a saturated fat source is any better for heart health than other saturated fat sources that increase LDL-C."
+                [ { premise = "If a given saturated fat source (x) increases LDL-C at a similar rate to other saturated fat sources and and a given saturated fat source has no other known qualities that counteract said increase in LDL-C, then there is not a reason to believe that such a saturated fat source (x) is any better for heart health than other saturated fat sources that increase LDL-C."
                   , notation = "(∀x(Px∧Qx→¬Rx))"
                   }
                 , { premise = "Coconut oil increases LDL-C at a similar rate to other saturated fat sources."

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Philosophy/Agnosticism.elm

@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ argumentAgnosticism =
         , { definiendum = "R(x,y)"
           , definiens = "(x) should temporarily withhold the belief that (y) is true"
           }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a person"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "y"
+          , definiens = "a proposition"
+          }
         , { definiendum = "o"
           , definiens = "the interlocutor"
           }

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Philosophy/AgriculturalPredation.elm

@@ -26,6 +26,15 @@ argumentAgriculturalPredation =
         , { definiendum = "W(x,y,z)"
           , definiens = "(x) involves a (y) regularly consuming, to the captor's benefit, a (z)"
           }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "an action"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "y"
+          , definiens = "an animal"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "z"
+          , definiens = "another animal"
+          }
         , { definiendum = "a"
           , definiens = "animal agriculture"
           }
@@ -35,7 +44,6 @@ argumentAgriculturalPredation =
         , { definiendum = "l"
           , definiens = "livestock"
           }
-
         ]
     , argumentFormalization =
         [ { premises =

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Philosophy/AntiRewilding.elm

@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ argumentAntiRewilding =
         , { definiendum = "x"
           , definiens = "a being"
           }
-        , { definiendum = "sentient animals"
+        , { definiendum = "a"
-          , definiens = "a"
+          , definiens = "sentient animals"
           }
         ]
     , argumentFormalization =

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Philosophy/EthicalSlurs.elm

@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ argumentEthicalSlurs =
         , { definiendum = "W(x)"
           , definiens = "it is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning"
           }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a slur"
+          }
         , { definiendum = "r"
           , definiens = "retard"
           }

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Science/EpidemiologyCausality.elm

@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ argumentEpidemiologyCausality =
         , { definiendum = "Q(x)"
           , definiens = "(x) generally provides good causal estimates"
           }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a research method"
+          }
         , { definiendum = "e"
           , definiens = "nutritional epidemiology"
           }