upRootNutrition/website
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/website.git synced 2025-06-17 04:45:12 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: added some arguments

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-11-17 01:28:10 -06:00
parent 1aa6599e57
commit aa7357d871
35 changed files with 187 additions and 208 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

51
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Philosophy/Agnosticism.elm Normal file → Executable file
View file

@ -5,50 +5,41 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
argumentAgnosticism : Argument
argumentAgnosticism =
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
{ argumentTitle = "Agnosticism Consistency Checker"
, propositionTitle = "An interlocutor (who cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition) should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true"
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
, proofLink = ""
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Uxy~5~3Kxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Kxy~5Wxy)),(~3Uor)%7C=(Wor)"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = ""
, definiens = ""
[ { definiendum = "U(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on (y)"
}
, { definiendum = ""
, definiens = ""
, { definiendum = "K(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) knows why they believe that (y) is true"
}
, { definiendum = ""
, definiens = ""
, { definiendum = "W(x,y)"
, definiens = "(x) should temporarily withhold the belief that (y) is true"
}
, { definiendum = ""
, definiens = ""
, { definiendum = "o"
, definiens = "the interlocutor"
}
, { definiendum = ""
, definiens = ""
}
, { definiendum = ""
, definiens = ""
, { definiendum = "r"
, definiens = "the proposition at hand"
}
]
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = ""
, notation = ""
[ { premise = "If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true."
, notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Uxy→¬Kxy))"
}
, { premise = ""
, notation = ""
, { premise = "If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true."
, notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Kxy→Wxy))"
}
, { premise = ""
, notation = ""
}
, { premise = ""
, notation = ""
}
, { premise = ""
, notation = ""
, { premise = "The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand."
, notation = "(¬Uor)"
}
]
, conclusion = ""
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
, conclusion = "Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true."
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Wor)"
}
]
}