upRootNutrition/website
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/website.git synced 2025-06-17 04:45:12 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: lots of work

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-12-08 02:18:36 -06:00
parent 4a19d6eb06
commit 848038b62b
158 changed files with 1361 additions and 685 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

60
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/EthicalSlurs.elm
View file

@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
module Debate.Arguments.EthicalSlurs exposing (..)
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
argumentEthicalSlurs : Argument
argumentEthicalSlurs =
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Using the Term Retard"
, propositionTitle = "It is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning."
, propositionReductio = ""
, propositionSummary = "The only historical examples of bigoted terms, such as slurs, becoming non-harmful to the demographics toward which they were historically targeted involve literally changing the usage of the term to something non-bigoted. I don’t see any historical precedent for a methodology that has been as successful in achieving this goal as altering the term's usage. Such as using the term \"nigga\" to mean \"friend\", for example."
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(~6x(~3Px~5Rx)),(~3Pr),(~3Qr~1Rr~5Sr),(Sr~5Wr)|=(Wr)"
, argumentCertainty = 7
, argumentImage = "ethicalslurs"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
, definiens = "(x)'s negative connotations have been neutralised"
}
, { definiendum = "Q(x)"
, definiens = "(x) has been rendered non-bigoted via altered usage"
}
, { definiendum = "R(x)"
, definiens = "oppressed people will continue to suffer from the use of (x)"
}
, { definiendum = "S(x)"
, definiens = "it is permissible to neutralise the term retard's negative connotations"
}
, { definiendum = "W(x)"
, definiens = "it is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning"
}
, { definiendum = "x"
, definiens = "a slur"
}
, { definiendum = "r"
, definiens = "retard"
}
]
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = "For all slurs, a slur's negative connotations have been neutralised if, and only if, slur has been rendered non-bigoted via altered usage."
, notation = "∀x(Px↔Qx)"
}
, { premise = "For all slurs, if it is not the case that slur's negative connotations have been neutralised, then oppressed people will continue to suffer from the use of slur."
, notation = "∀x(¬Px→Rx)"
}
, { premise = "It is not the case that the term retard's negative connotations have been neutralised."
, notation = "¬Pr"
}
, { premise = "If the term retard has not been rendered non-bigoted via altered usage and oppressed people will continue to suffer from the use of the term retard, then it is permissible to neutralise the term retard's negative connotations."
, notation = "¬Qr∧Rr→Sr"
}
, { premise = "If it is permissible to neutralise the term retard's negative connotations, then It is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning."
, notation = "Sr→Wr"
}
]
, conclusion = "Therefore, it is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning."
, conclusionNotation = "Wr"
}
]
}