mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/website.git
synced 2025-06-16 04:25:11 -05:00
feat: added arguments
This commit is contained in:
parent
627c01538d
commit
4e2cdfd70e
5 changed files with 188 additions and 0 deletions
33
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/FructoseNAFLD.elm
Normal file
33
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/FructoseNAFLD.elm
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
|||
module Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.FructoseNAFLD exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
argumentFructoseNAFLD : Argument
|
||||
argumentFructoseNAFLD =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument Against Lipgenic Fructose"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Fructose doesn't seem to uniquely cause fatty liver disease."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5~3Q),(P)|=(~3Q)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P"
|
||||
, definiens = "experimental investigations into fructose overfeeding consistently fail to recreate a fatty liver phenotype in humans"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q"
|
||||
, definiens = "fructose seems to uniquely cause fatty liver disease"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = "If experimental investigations into fructose overfeeding consistently fail to recreate a fatty liver phenotype in humans, then fructose does not seem to uniquely cause fatty liver disease."
|
||||
, notation = "(P→¬Q)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = "Experimental investigations into fructose overfeeding consistently fail to recreate a fatty liver phenotype in humans."
|
||||
, notation = "(P)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, fructose does not seem to uniquely cause fatty liver disease."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴¬Q)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
38
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/HealthyDairy.elm
Normal file
38
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/HealthyDairy.elm
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
|||
module Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.HealthyDairy exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
argumentHealthyDairy : Argument
|
||||
argumentHealthyDairy =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Healthy Dairy Products"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Non-churned, non-homogenized dairy do not cause atherosclerosis."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5Qx)),(~3Qh)|=(~3Ph)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) causes atherosclerosis"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "populations consuming more (x) have higher rates of atherosclerosis after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "high saturated fat food"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "h"
|
||||
, definiens = "non-churned, non-homogenized dairy"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = "For all things, if high saturated fat food (x) causes atherosclerosis, then populations consuming more high saturated fat food (x) have higher rates of atherosclerosis after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x(Px→Qx))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = "Populations consuming more non-churned, non-homogenized dairy do not have higher rates of atherosclerosis after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates."
|
||||
, notation = "(¬Qh)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, non-churned, non-homogenized dairy do not cause atherosclerosis."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴¬Ph)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
39
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/HealthySeedOils.elm
Normal file
39
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/HealthySeedOils.elm
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
|||
module Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.HealthySeedOils exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
argumentHealthySeedOils : Argument
|
||||
argumentHealthySeedOils =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Overwhelmingly Healthy Seed Oils"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Non-hydrogenated vegetable oils are overwhelmingly healthy."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5Qx)),(Pv)|=(Qv)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is overwhelmingly healthy"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) consistently associates with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "a food"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "v"
|
||||
, definiens = "non-hydrogenated vegetable oils"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = "For all things, food (x) is overwhelmingly healthy if, and only if, food (x) consistently associates with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x(Px↔Qx))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = "Non-hydrogenated vegetable oils consistently associate with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates."
|
||||
, notation = "(Pv)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, non-hydrogenated vegetable oils are overwhelmingly healthy."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Qv)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
|||
module Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.UnhealthProcessedMeat exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
argumentUnhealthProcessedMeat : Argument
|
||||
argumentUnhealthProcessedMeat =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Overwhelmingly Unhealthy Processed Meat"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Processed meat is overwhelmingly unhealthy."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(Qs)|=(Ps)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is overwhelmingly unhealthy"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) consistently associates with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "a food"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "s"
|
||||
, definiens = "processed meat"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = "For all things, food (x) is overwhelmingly unhealthy if, and only if, food (x) consistently associates with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x(Px↔Qx))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = "Processed meat consistently associates with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates."
|
||||
, notation = "(Qs)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, processed meat is overwhelmingly unhealthy."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Ps)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
39
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/UnhealthyRedMeat.elm
Normal file
39
frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Nutrition/UnhealthyRedMeat.elm
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
|||
module Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.UnhealthyRedMeat exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
argumentUnhealthyRedMeat : Argument
|
||||
argumentUnhealthyRedMeat =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Overwhelmingly Unhealthy Red Meat"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Red meat and processed meat are overwhelmingly unhealthy."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(Qm)|=(Pm)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is overwhelmingly unhealthy"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) consistently associates with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "a food"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "m"
|
||||
, definiens = "unprocessed red meat"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = "For all things, food (x) is overwhelmingly unhealthy if, and only if, food (x) consistently associates with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x(Px↔Qx))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = "Unprocessed red meat consistently associates with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after adjustment or control over relevant confounders and covariates."
|
||||
, notation = "(Qm)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, unprocessed red meat is overwhelmingly unhealthy."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Pm)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue