feat: uncucked my arguments

frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Agnosticism.elm

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+module Debate.Arguments.Agnosticism exposing (..)
+
+import Debate.Types exposing (..)
+
+
+argumentAgnosticism : Argument
+argumentAgnosticism =
+    { argumentTitle = "Agnosticism Consistency Checker"
+    , propositionTitle = "An interlocutor (who cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition) should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true."
+    , propositionReductio = ""
+    , propositionSummary = "Summary"
+    , proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Pxy~5~3Qxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Qxy~5Rxy)),(~3Por)|=(Ror)"
+    
+    , definitionTable =
+        [ { definiendum = "P(x,y)"
+          , definiens = "(x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on (y)"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "Q(x,y)"
+          , definiens = "(x) knows why they believe that (y) is true"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "R(x,y)"
+          , definiens = "(x) should temporarily withhold the belief that (y) is true"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "x"
+          , definiens = "a person"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "y"
+          , definiens = "a proposition"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "o"
+          , definiens = "the interlocutor"
+          }
+        , { definiendum = "r"
+          , definiens = "the proposition at hand"
+          }
+        ]
+    , argumentFormalization =
+        [ { premises =
+                [ { premise = "If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true."
+                  , notation = "∀x∀y(¬Pxy→¬Qxy)"
+                  }
+                , { premise = "If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true."
+                  , notation = "∀x∀y(¬Qxy→Rxy)"
+                  }
+                , { premise = "The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand."
+                  , notation = "(¬Por)"
+                  }
+                ]
+          , conclusion = "Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true."
+          , conclusionNotation = "Ror"
+          }
+        ]
+    }