mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/website.git
synced 2025-06-16 04:25:11 -05:00
feat: added arguments
This commit is contained in:
Nick
parent
da420159f4
commit
2e1135e510
11 changed files with 259 additions and 335 deletions
|
|
@ -5,50 +5,47 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
|||
|
||||
argumentBoobyTrapPagers : Argument
|
||||
argumentBoobyTrapPagers =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument Against Israeli Pagers as Booby-Traps"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, proofLink = "The Israeli pagers were not booby-traps."
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "B(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is a booby-trap"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "D(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is a device or material"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "K(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is designed, constructed, or adapted to kill or injure"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "F(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) functions (as a device or material that was designed, constructed, or adapted to kill or injure) when a person disturbs or approaches an apparently safe act"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "a device"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "p"
|
||||
, definiens = "Israeli pagers"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "For all x, x is a booby-trap if, and only if, x is a device or material AND x is designed, constructed, or adapted to kill or injure AND x functions (as a device or material that was designed, constructed, or adapted to kill or injure) when a person disturbs or approaches an apparently safe act."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x(Bx↔(Dx∧Kx∧Fx)))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "The Israeli pagers were devices or materials."
|
||||
, notation = "(Dp)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "The Israeli pagers were designed, constructed, or adapted to kill or injure."
|
||||
, notation = "(Kp)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "The Israeli pagers did not function (as devices or materials that were designed, constructed, or adapted to kill or injure) when a person disturbs or approaches an apparently safe act."
|
||||
, notation = "(¬Fp)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, the Israeli pagers were not booby-traps."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴¬Bp)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,50 +5,56 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
|||
|
||||
argumentFlatEarthDebunk : Argument
|
||||
argumentFlatEarthDebunk =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Flat Earth Internal Critique"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "The stars in the sky will not be perceived as rotating clockwise from anywhere else on the flat Earth, as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "The argument is structured to demonstrate that, within the context of a flat Earth model, if the stars are perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from the center, they cannot also be perceived as rotating clockwise from any point on the Earth."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y~6z(Pxy~5(Qyz~5Rxz))),(Pkt~1Qta),(Rka~5~3Ska)|=(~3Ska)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P(x,y)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from point (y)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q(y,z)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(y) is on the same side of the rotational plane as (z)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "R(x,z)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) will be perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from (z), as long as you are looking towards the plane"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "S(x,z)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) will be perceived as rotating clockwise from (z), as long as you are looking towards the plane"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "an object"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "y"
|
||||
, definiens = "vantage point A"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "z"
|
||||
, definiens = "vantage points B"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "k"
|
||||
, definiens = "stars in the sky"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "t"
|
||||
, definiens = "the center of the flat Earth"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "a"
|
||||
, definiens = "anywhere else on the flat Earth"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "If an object (x) is perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from vantage point A (y), then, for all vantage points B (z), if vantage point A (y) is on the same side of the rotational plane as vantage points B (z), then the object (x) will be perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from vantage points B (z), as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x∀y∀z(Pxy→(Qyz→Rxz)))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "The stars in the sky are perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from the center of the flat Earth and the center of the flat Earth is on the same side of the rotational plane as anywhere else on the flat Earth."
|
||||
, notation = "(Pkt∧Qta)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "If the stars in the sky are perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from anywhere else on the flat Earth, as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane, then the stars in the sky will not be perceived as rotating clockwise from anywhere else on the flat Earth, as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane."
|
||||
, notation = "(Rka→¬Ska)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, the stars in the sky will not be perceived as rotating clockwise from anywhere else on the flat Earth, as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴¬Ska)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,50 +5,29 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
|||
|
||||
argumentTruncatedMeta : Argument
|
||||
argumentTruncatedMeta =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument For Truncated Meta-Analysis"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Meta-analytic summations that include adequately powered studies to the exclusion of insufficiently powered studies will provide better causal estimates than meta-analytic summations that include both adequately powered studies and insufficiently powered studies."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P)%7C=(Q)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P"
|
||||
, definiens = "underpowered studies provide weaker causal estimates than adequately powered studies"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q"
|
||||
, definiens = "meta-analytic summations that include adequately powered studies to the exclusion of insufficiently powered studies will provide better causal estimates than meta-analytic summations that include both adequately powered studies and insufficiently powered studies"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "If underpowered studies provide weaker causal estimates than adequately powered studies, then meta-analytic summations that include adequately powered studies to the exclusion of insufficiently powered studies will provide better causal estimates than meta-analytic summations that include both adequately powered studies and insufficiently powered studies."
|
||||
, notation = "(P→Q)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "Underpowered studies provide weaker causal estimates than adequately powered studies."
|
||||
, notation = "(P)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, meta-analytic summations that include adequately powered studies to the exclusion of insufficiently powered studies will provide better causal estimates than meta-analytic summations that include both adequately powered studies and insufficiently powered studies."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Q)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,50 +5,41 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
|||
|
||||
argumentFineTuning : Argument
|
||||
argumentFineTuning =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Fine Tuning Debunk"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Fine tuning is an infinitely regressive explanation for God"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Fx~5Dx)),(Fg),(Dg~5T)%7C=(T)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "F(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is finely tuned"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "D(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) has a designer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "T"
|
||||
, definiens = "fine tuning is an infinitely regressive explanation for God"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "a thing"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "g"
|
||||
, definiens = "God's constitution"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "If something is finely tuned, then something has a designer."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x(Fx→Dx))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "God's constitution is finely tuned."
|
||||
, notation = "(Fg)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "If God's constitution has a designer, then fine tuning is an infinitely regressive explanation for God."
|
||||
, notation = "(Dg→T)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, fine tuning is an infinitely regressive explanation for God."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴T)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,50 +5,54 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
|||
|
||||
argumentAgriculturalPredation : Argument
|
||||
argumentAgriculturalPredation =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Animal Agirculture Counting as Predation"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Animal agriculture counts as predation."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y~6z(Px~4Qxyz~1(Rxyz~2Sxyz)~1Txyz)),(Qahl),(Rahl~2Sahl),(Tahl)%7C=(Pa)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) counts as predation"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q(x,y,z)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) involves a (y) regularly capturing a (z)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "R(x,y,z)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) involves a (y) regularly killing a (z)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "S(x,y,z)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) involves a (y) regularly subduing a (z)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "T(x,y,z)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) involves a (y) regularly consuming, to the captor's benefit, a (z)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "a"
|
||||
, definiens = "animal agriculture"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "h"
|
||||
, definiens = "humans"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "l"
|
||||
, definiens = "livestock"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "Something counts as predation if, and only if, something involves an animal regularly capturing, killing or subduing, and consuming, to the captor's benefit, another animal."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x∀y∀z(Px↔Qxyz∧(Rxyz∨Sxyz)∧Txyz))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "Animal agriculture involves humans regularly capturing livestock."
|
||||
, notation = "(Qahl)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "Animal agriculture involves humans regularly killing or subduing livestock."
|
||||
, notation = "(Rahl∨Sahl)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "Animal agriculture involves humans regularly consuming, to the captors' benefit, livestock."
|
||||
, notation = "(Tahl)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, animal agriculture counts as predation."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Pa)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,53 +1,51 @@
|
|||
module Debate.Arguments.Veganism.AnimalRights exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
argumentAnimalRights : Argument
|
||||
argumentAnimalRights =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Animal Rights"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "We should not exploit animals to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Wx~5Nx)),(~3Wa~5~7t(Ata~5(Ath~5~3Wh))),(~3~7t(Ata~5(Ath~5~3Wh))),(Wa)%7C=(Na)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "W(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) has moral worth"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "N(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "we should exploit (x) to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "∃t(At(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "there exists a (t) that is absent in (x)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "a being"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "t"
|
||||
, definiens = "trait"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "a"
|
||||
, definiens = "animal"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "h"
|
||||
, definiens = "human"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "For all things, if a being has moral worth, then we should not exploit it to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x(Wx→Nx))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "If animals don’t have moral worth, then there exists a trait that is absent in animals such that if it were absent in humans, humans wouldn’t have moral worth."
|
||||
, notation = "(¬Wa→∃t(Ata→(Ath→¬Wh)))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "There doesn’t exist a trait that is absent in animals such that if it were absent in humans, humans wouldn’t have moral worth"
|
||||
, notation = "(¬∃t(Ata→(Ath→¬Wh)))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, we should not exploit animals to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴Na)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,50 +5,47 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
|||
|
||||
argumentAntiRewilding : Argument
|
||||
argumentAntiRewilding =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Vegan Society Definition Reductio"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "It is vegan to eat Groot."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Vx~4~3Ex)),(~6x~6y(~3Ax~5~3E(e(y)))),(~3Ag)%7C=(V(e(g)))"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "V(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "it is vegan to do (x)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "E(x,y)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) exploits (y)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "A(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) is an animal"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "a being"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "y"
|
||||
, definiens = "an animal"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "e"
|
||||
, definiens = "eat"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "g"
|
||||
, definiens = "Groot"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "For all things, it is vegan to do something if and only if that thing does not exploit animals."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x(Vx↔¬Ex))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "If some beings are not animals, then eating those beings does not exploit animals."
|
||||
, notation = "(∀x∀y(¬Ax→¬E(e(y))))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "Groot is not an animal."
|
||||
, notation = "(¬Ag)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, it is vegan to eat Groot."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴V(e(g)))"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,50 +5,35 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
|||
|
||||
argumentAntiVandalism : Argument
|
||||
argumentAntiVandalism =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument Against Zoo Vandalism"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Vandalizing zoos increases the probability of harming the animals they keep."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P),(Q~5R)%7C=(R)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P"
|
||||
, definiens = "zoos must spend extra money cleaning graffiti"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q"
|
||||
, definiens = "zoos will have less money to devote to animal care"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "R"
|
||||
, definiens = "vandalizing zoos increases the probability of harming the animals they keep"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "If zoos must spend extra money cleaning graffiti, then zoos will have less money to devote to animal care."
|
||||
, notation = "(P→Q)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "Zoos must spend extra money cleaning graffiti."
|
||||
, notation = "(P)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "If zoos will have less money to devote to animal care, then vandalizing zoos increases the probability of harming the animals they keep."
|
||||
, notation = "(Q→R)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, vandalizing zoos increases the probability of harming the animals they keep."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴R)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,50 +5,47 @@ import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
|||
|
||||
argumentColonizingNature : Argument
|
||||
argumentColonizingNature =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for the Non-Violence Displacement of Nature"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "We are justified in displacing nature into non-existence"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~1~3Q~1~3R~1~3S~5T),(P),(~3Q),(~3R),(~3S)%7C=(T)"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P"
|
||||
, definiens = "the natural world contains intolerable rights violations"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "Q"
|
||||
, definiens = "we know that nature is net positive or net negative for utility"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "R"
|
||||
, definiens = "there is any known practical means by which to end the rights violations beyond the use of force"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "S"
|
||||
, definiens = "the natural world is currently instrumentally vital to facilitating human flourishing"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
, { definiendum = "T"
|
||||
, definiens = "we are justified in displacing nature into non-existence"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
[ { premise = "If the natural world contains intolerable rights violations and we do not know that nature is net positive or net negative for utility and there is not any known practical means by which to end the rights violations beyond the use of force and the natural world is not currently instrumentally vital to facilitating human flourishing, then we are justified in displacing nature into non-existence."
|
||||
, notation = "(P∧¬Q∧¬R∧¬S→T)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "Nature entails intolerable rights violations."
|
||||
, notation = "(P)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "We do not know if nature is net positive or net negative for utility."
|
||||
, notation = "(¬Q)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "There is not any known practical means by which to end the rights violations beyond the use of force."
|
||||
, notation = "(¬R)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
, { premise = "The natural world is not currently instrumentally vital to facilitating human flourishing."
|
||||
, notation = "(¬S)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
, conclusion = "Therefore, we are justified in displacing nature into non-existence."
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(T∴)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
|
|||
module Debate.Arguments.Veganism.OrcaDorsalFins exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
argumentOrcaDorsalFins : Argument
|
||||
argumentOrcaDorsalFins =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Title"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Proposition"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = ""
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = ""
|
||||
, definiens = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, argumentFormalization =
|
||||
[ { premises =
|
||||
[ { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { premise = ""
|
||||
, notation = ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
, conclusion = ""
|
||||
, conclusionNotation = "(∴)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -6,8 +6,25 @@ import Config.Identity as I exposing (..)
|
|||
import Debate.Arguments.Ancestry.AntagonisticPleiotropy exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ancestry.HealthSeeker exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ancestry.ImmortalityReductio exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ancestry.PolyphenolReductio exposing (argumentPolyphenolReductio)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ancestry.PolyphenolReductio exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ethics.Abortion exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ethics.EfilismPatrolSquad exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ethics.EthicalSlurs exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Gender.TransPeople exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.AnabolicKeto exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.HealthyFood exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.Malondialdehyde exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.SaturatedFatLDL exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Philosophy.Agnosticism exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Politics.BoobyTrapPagers exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Science.FlatEarthDebunk exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Science.TruncatedMeta exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Theism.FineTuning exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Veganism.AgriculturalPredation exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Veganism.AnimalRights exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Veganism.AntiRewilding exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Veganism.AntiVandalism exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Veganism.ColonizingNature exposing (..)
|
||||
import Debate.Helpers exposing (..)
|
||||
import Effect exposing (Effect)
|
||||
import Element exposing (..)
|
||||
|
|
@ -20,11 +37,6 @@ import Page exposing (Page)
|
|||
import Route exposing (Route)
|
||||
import Shared
|
||||
import View exposing (View)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ethics.Abortion exposing (argumentAbortion)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Ethics.EfilismPatrolSquad exposing (argumentEfilismPatrolSquad)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.Malondialdehyde exposing (argumentMalondialdehyde)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Nutrition.SaturatedFatLDL exposing (argumentSaturatedFatLDL)
|
||||
import Debate.Arguments.Philosophy.Agnosticism exposing (argumentAgnosticism)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
page : Shared.Model -> Route () -> Page Model Msg
|
||||
|
|
@ -113,18 +125,30 @@ debateList =
|
|||
, column [] (List.map argumentMaker category.arguments)
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
[ { categoryName = "Ethics"
|
||||
[ { categoryName = "Philosophy"
|
||||
, arguments =
|
||||
[ argumentEthicalSlurs
|
||||
, argumentAbortion
|
||||
, argumentAgnosticism
|
||||
, argumentAnabolicKeto
|
||||
, argumentAntagonisticPleiotropy
|
||||
, argumentEfilismPatrolSquad
|
||||
, argumentHealthSeeker
|
||||
, argumentImmortalityReductio
|
||||
, argumentPolyphenolReductio
|
||||
, argumentAbortion
|
||||
, argumentEfilismPatrolSquad
|
||||
, argumentMalondialdehyde
|
||||
, argumentPolyphenolReductio
|
||||
, argumentSaturatedFatLDL
|
||||
, argumentAgnosticism
|
||||
, argumentTransPeople
|
||||
, argumentHealthyFood
|
||||
, argumentBoobyTrapPagers
|
||||
, argumentFlatEarthDebunk
|
||||
, argumentTruncatedMeta
|
||||
, argumentFineTuning
|
||||
, argumentAgriculturalPredation
|
||||
, argumentAnimalRights
|
||||
, argumentAntiRewilding
|
||||
, argumentAntiVandalism
|
||||
, argumentColonizingNature
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue