mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/website.git
synced 2025-06-17 04:45:12 -05:00
feat: added gibberish page and argument summaries
This commit is contained in:
Nick
parent
8b0c2b632e
commit
23ce3b3f68
67 changed files with 498 additions and 283 deletions
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentAbortion =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument Against Sentient Abortions"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "One's whims are not a sufficient justification for the termination of sentient human life."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Consenting to becoming pregnant, or at least implicitly accepting the risks of pregnancy by engaging in reckless sex, should disqualify one from having the opportunity to a abort a sentient fetus if the pregnancy doesn't pose a significant health risk to the mother."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~2Q~5R),(P),(Q),((R~1F~1~3H)~5M),(F),(~3H),(M~5~3W)%7C=(~3W)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 6
|
||||
, argumentImage = "abortion"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentAgnosticism =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Agnosticism Consistency Checker"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "An interlocutor (who cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition) should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Listen, if one doesn't know what would change their mind on a topic, about which they form strong opinions, then it's not clear why they'd even hold said opinions strongly in the first place. Given this, it would make more sense just to suspend your judgement in the meantime and form no opinions on the subject."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Pxy~5~3Qxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Qxy~5Rxy)),(~3Por)|=(Ror)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 9
|
||||
, argumentImage = "agnostic"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentAgriculturalPredation =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Animal Agirculture as Predation"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Animal agriculture counts as predation."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Some vegans suggest that killing odd order predators is wrong because predation is permissible. However, if animal agriculture also counts as predation, it's analytically entailed that animal agriculture is permissible as well."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y~6z(Px~4Qxyz~1(Rxyz~2Sxyz)~1Wxyz)),(Qahl),(Rahl~2Sahl),(Wahl)%7C=(Pa)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "predatoragriculture"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentAnimalRights =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Animal Rights"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "We should not exploit animals to any greater degree than we would tolerate for humans."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "I view animal rights as the logical extension of trait-adjusted human rights to non-human animals. As such, if one wants to deny that animals should be given these trait-adjusted rights, they'll have to name a trait that accounts for the differential normative evaluation. Typically this is done by rejecting P3 and saying something retarded."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5~3Qx)),(~3Pa~5~7t(Rta~5(Rth~5~3Ph))),(~3~7t(Rta~5(Rth~5~3Ph))),(Pa)|=(~3Qa)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentAntiRewilding =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument Against Rewilding"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Rewilding sentient animals is immoral."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "I view animal rights as the logical extension of trait-adjusted human rights to non-human animals. I think humans have the right not to be bred into wild circumstances where they're faced with the full brutality of the natural world, and by extension I think non-human animals have this right too."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5~3Qx)),(Pa),(~3Qa~5~3R),(~3R~5Sa)|=(Sa)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "rewilding"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,10 +8,9 @@ argumentAntiVandalism =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument Against Zoo Vandalism"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Vandalizing zoos increases the probability of harming the animals they keep."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "The more we pressure institutions that hold innocent animals captive to direct their funds to endeavours or projects unrelated to animal care, the less money those institutions are going to have to devote to animal care."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P),(Q~5R)%7C=(R)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 7
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 8
|
||||
, argumentImage = "antivandalism"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
[ { definiendum = "P"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentBoobyTrapPagers =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument Against Israeli Pagers as Booby-Traps"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "The Israeli pagers were not booby-traps."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4(Qx~1Rx~1Sx))),(Qp),(Rp),(~3Sp)|=(~3Pp)"
|
||||
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Based on the definitions found in the IHL Databases, it's unlikely that the Israeli pager bombs qualify as booby-traps. However, there is sufficient ambiguity in the language that I'm not convinced it's necessarily an analytical truth."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4(Qx~1Rx~1Sx))),(Qp),(Rp),(~3Sp)|=(~3Pp)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 4
|
||||
, argumentImage = "pagers"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
@ -26,7 +25,7 @@ argumentBoobyTrapPagers =
|
|||
, { definiendum = "S(x)"
|
||||
, definiens = "(x) functions (as a device or material that was designed, constructed, or adapted to kill or injure) when a person disturbs or approaches an apparently safe act"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "a device"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "p"
|
||||
|
|
@ -52,4 +51,4 @@ argumentBoobyTrapPagers =
|
|||
, conclusionNotation = "¬Pp"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentDairyCowRape =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Dairy Cattle Being Raped"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "A bull mating with a cow qualifies as rape."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "It's not clear that non-human animal procreation isn't an example of rape if we take sexual interaction in the absence of informed concent to be rape. So, it seems to follow the a bull making with a cow is rape."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(Px~4(Qxy~1~3Ryx))),(Qae),(~3Rea)|=(Pa)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentEpidemiologyCausality =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Nutritional Epidemiology"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Nutritional epidemiology generally provides good causal estimates."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "It's just straightforwardly the case that nutritional epidemiology has outstanding translation rates with randomized controlled trials, or at least these is overwhelmingly consistent compatibility in the results. If randomized controlled trials are the standard against which other research methods are to be evaluated, it's not clear why nutritional epidemiology wouldn't be trustworthy in the aggregate."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5Qx)),(Pe)|=(Qe)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 8
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentEthicalSlurs =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Using the Term Retard"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "It is generally permissible to use the term retard with an altered non-bigoted meaning."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "The only historical examples of bigoted terms, such as slurs, becoming non-harmful to the demographics toward which they were historically targeted involve literally changing the usage of the term to something non-bigoted. I don’t see any historical precedent for a methodology that has been as successful in achieving this goal as altering the term's usage. Such as using the term \"nigga\" to mean \"friend\", for example."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(~6x(~3Px~5Rx)),(~3Pr),(~3Qr~1Rr~5Sr),(Sr~5Wr)|=(Wr)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 7
|
||||
, argumentImage = "ethicalslurs"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ argumentFineTuning =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Fine Tuning Debunk"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Fine tuning is an infinitely regressive explanation for God"
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "It's not clear why God's constitution wouldn't count as finely tuned, and to the extent that it does count as finely-tuned, it's by extension unclear why fine-tuning wouldn't be an infinitely regressive argument for God's existence."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5Qx)),(Pg),(Qg~5R)%7C=(R)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "finetuning"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ argumentImmortalityReductio : Argument
|
|||
argumentImmortalityReductio =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Appeal to Nature Immortality Reductio"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Senescence does not result in death."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionReductio = "People who appeal to nature in this fashion assert that death cannot result from natural biological processes. Usually this is asserted in order to avoid accepting that LDL is causative of atherosclerosis."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "If one commits to this variation of the appeal to nature fallacy, it's unclear why they wouldn't be subsequently committed to affirm that humans are immortal, like Connor fucking MacLeod."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(Hx~5~3Rxy)),(Hs)%7C=(~3Rsd)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "immortality"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ argumentMalondialdehyde : Argument
|
|||
argumentMalondialdehyde =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Atherogenic Omega-3 Reductio"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Omega-3s are atherogenic."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionReductio = "Certain anti-seed oil proponents assert that seed oils cause atherosclerosis via omega-6-derived malondialdehyde, and that this is the only cause of atherosclerosis. However, they often also assert that omega-3 fatty acids are anti-atherogenic, despite the fact that omega-3s actually produce more malondialdehyde than omega-6s."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "If one takes the view that in order for a substance to increase the risk of atherosclerosis, it must facilitate the oxidative modification of LDL particles via malondialdehyde production, and one also affirms that omega-3s are anti-atherogenic, then this would imply that all fatty acids that produce malondialdehyde, including omega-3s, must also be atherogenic, which contradicts the their belief that omega-3s are heart-healthy."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(Qm),(Pm~5~6x(Rx))%7C=(Ro)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 6
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ argumentOddOrderPredators : Argument
|
|||
argumentOddOrderPredators =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Culling Odd Order Predators"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "It is permissible to prevent predation with lethal force to the same degree we would tolerate for humans."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionReductio = "I view animal rights as the logical extension of trait-adjusted human rights to non-human animals. I think humans have the right not to be exposed to circumstances where they're hunted for food, and I think it is permissible to use lethal force to save the lives of the hunted, all else equal. By extension I think non-human animals have this right too."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5~3Qx)),(Pa),(~3Qa~5R)%7C=(R)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentOstroveganism =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Vegan Bivalves"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Bivalves are not likely to be sentient."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "I view animal rights as the logical extension of trait-adjusted human rights to non-human animals. However, I do not believe that non-sentient human bodies, such as brainless or brain-dead human bodies, have such human rights. By extension, I don't believe that non-human animals that lack brains possess these rights either."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx~1Rx~1(Sx~2Wx))),(Qc~1~3Rc~1Sc~1~3Wc),(~3Pc~5~6x(~3Tx))|=(~3Tb)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "ostroveganism"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ argumentPollinationReductio : Argument
|
|||
argumentPollinationReductio =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Vegan Anti-Pollination Reductio"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Apples are not vegan"
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4~3Qx)),(Qb),(~3Pb~5~6y(~3Ry))|=(~3Ra)"
|
||||
|
||||
, propositionReductio = "Some vegans hold to a deontic principle that any form of animal exploitation is wrong, and the products of exploitation are to be boycotted and designated non-vegan."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "If one accepts that no animal exploitation is permissible, they're committed to some truly hilarious positions, such as apples not being vegan because we exploit the natural behaviour of bees to pollinate our apple trees."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4~3Qx)),(Qb),(~3Pb~5~6y(~3Ry))|=(~3Ra)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "pollinationreductio"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
@ -32,7 +31,7 @@ argumentPollinationReductio =
|
|||
, { definiendum = "b"
|
||||
, definiens = "bees pollinating human crops"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "a"
|
||||
, { definiendum = "a"
|
||||
, definiens = "apples"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
@ -52,4 +51,4 @@ argumentPollinationReductio =
|
|||
, conclusionNotation = "¬Ra"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ argumentPolyphenolReductio : Argument
|
|||
argumentPolyphenolReductio =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Anti-Polyphenol Reductio"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Anti-polyphenol, ancestral diet advocates are committed to favouring GMOs."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = "asdasd"
|
||||
, propositionReductio = "Some carnivore diet proponents suggest that phytochemical compounds, such as polyphenols, are actually harmful to human beings."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "If one is committed to the notions that polyphenols in plants are bad for humans, and that grass-fed red meat is the healthiest available type of red meat, then they're pragmatically committed to being pro-GMO to lower the grass-derived polyphenol content of grass-fed beef."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(Px~1Qxy~5Rxy)),(Pp),(Qpg),(Rpg~5Spg),(Spg~5Wp)|=(Wp)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 7
|
||||
, argumentImage = "polyphenolreductio"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ argumentScratcherPioneers : Argument
|
|||
argumentScratcherPioneers =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Tattoo Pioneers were Scratchers"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "The original trailblazers of modern tattooing were scratchers."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionReductio = "Some tattoo artists condemn scratchers and their associated culture due to poor observation of sanitation standards and lack of mentorship and also simultaneously hold the original trailblazers of the tattoo industry in high esteem."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "If what qualifies a given tattoo artist as a scratcher is poor observation of sanitation standards and lack of mentorship, then it's just straightforwardly entailed that the original trailblazers of the tattoo industry were scratchers."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx~2Rx~2Sx)),(Qt),(Rt),(St)%7C=(Pt)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "tattooscratchers"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentTransPeople =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument For Trans Identity"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "A trans person of the male sex is a woman and a trans person with female sex is a man."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Virtually 100% of the debate surrounding trans identity is merely a trivial semantic disagreement about what constitutes a man or a woman. Below is a formal argument for characterization of a man and a women that maximally satisfies both parties and minimizes absurdities."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Rx~1Wx)),(~6x(Qx~4Sx~1Wx)),(Ra~1Wa),(Sg~1Wg)|=(Pa~1Qg)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "transpeople"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
@ -38,10 +37,10 @@ argumentTransPeople =
|
|||
, { definiendum = "x"
|
||||
, definiens = "someone"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "a"
|
||||
, { definiendum = "a"
|
||||
, definiens = "a trans person of the male sex"
|
||||
}
|
||||
, { definiendum = "g"
|
||||
, { definiendum = "g"
|
||||
, definiens = "a trans person of the female sex"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentTruncatedMeta =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument For Truncated Meta-Analysis"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Meta-analytic summations that include adequately powered studies to the exclusion of insufficiently powered studies will provide better causal estimates than meta-analytic summations that include both adequately powered studies and insufficiently powered studies."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P)%7C=(Q)"
|
||||
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Some people argue that omission of studies from meta-analysis is bad form because the more point estimates, the better. However, I argue that there are circumstances where including more studies can actually lower the quality of causal estimates."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P)%7C=(Q)"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 7
|
||||
, argumentImage = "truncatedmetas"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
@ -34,4 +33,4 @@ argumentTruncatedMeta =
|
|||
, conclusionNotation = "Q"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentUnhealthyCoconutOil =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument For Atherogenic Coconut Oil"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "There is not a reason to believe that coconut oil is any better for heart health than other saturated fat sources that increase LDL-C."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "LDL causally associates with heart disease in a linear and proportional manner, and in all cases exposures that durably increase LDL over time produce likewise increases in heart disease risk. Coconut oil is one such exposure."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~1Qx~5~3Rx)),(Pc),(Qc)|=(~3Rc)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 9
|
||||
, argumentImage = "coconutoil"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentUnhealthyProcessedMeat =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Unhealthy Processed Meat"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Processed meat is overwhelmingly unhealthy."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Even when you account for factors that could plausibly influence the results, processed meat has been shown to consistently increase the risk of morbidity and mortality, strongly suggesting that they directly contribute to worse health outcomes, particularly with respect to colorectal cancer and heart disease."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(Qs)|=(Ps)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 8
|
||||
, argumentImage = "processedmeat"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentUnhealthyRedMeat =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Unhealthy Red Meat"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Red meat and processed meat are overwhelmingly unhealthy."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Even when you account for factors that could plausibly influence the results, unprocessed red meat has been shown to consistently increase the risk of morbidity and mortality, strongly suggesting that they directly contribute to worse health outcomes, particularly with respect to colorectal cancer and heart disease."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(Qm)|=(Pm)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 7
|
||||
, argumentImage = "redmeat"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,8 @@ argumentUnhealthySaturatedFat =
|
|||
{ argumentTitle = "Argument Against Saturated Fat"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "Most sources of saturated fat are overwhelmingly unhealthy."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Even when you account for factors that could plausibly influence the results, most animal-derived saturated fats have been shown to consistently increase the risk of morbidity and mortality, strongly suggesting that they directly contribute to worse health outcomes, particularly with respect to heart disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4Qx)),(Qf)|=(Pf)"
|
||||
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 9
|
||||
, argumentImage = "saturatedfat"
|
||||
, definitionTable =
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ argumentVeganSocietyReductio : Argument
|
|||
argumentVeganSocietyReductio =
|
||||
{ argumentTitle = "Vegan Society Definition Reductio"
|
||||
, propositionTitle = "It is vegan to eat Groot."
|
||||
, propositionReductio = ""
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
|
||||
, propositionReductio = "Those who hold to the Vegan Society's definition of veganism index the object of moral value to belonging to the animal kingdom."
|
||||
, propositionSummary = "If one holds to the position that exploiting a being is wrong so long as that being is an animal, then it is straightforwardly entailed that exploiting creatures like Groot would be an action compatible with veganism."
|
||||
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4~3Qx)),(~6x~6y(~3Rx~5~3Q(e(y)))),(~3Rg)%7C=(P(e(g)))"
|
||||
, argumentCertainty = 10
|
||||
, argumentImage = "vegansociety"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue