website/frontend/src/Debate/Arguments/Science/EpidemiologyCausality.elm

37 lines
1.6 KiB
Elm
Raw Normal View History

2024-11-18 14:35:20 -06:00
module Debate.Arguments.Science.EpidemiologyCausality exposing (..)
2024-11-18 00:54:11 -06:00
import Debate.Types exposing (..)
argumentEpidemiologyCausality : Argument
argumentEpidemiologyCausality =
{ argumentTitle = "Argument for Nutritional Epidemiology"
, propositionTitle = "Nutritional epidemiology generally provides good causal estimates."
, propositionReductio = ""
2024-11-18 00:54:11 -06:00
, propositionSummary = "Summary"
, proofLink = "https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~5Qx)),(Pe)|=(Qe)"
, definitionTable =
[ { definiendum = "P(x)"
, definiens = "(x) consistently identifies associations that are later confirmed by randomized controlled trials"
}
, { definiendum = "Q(x)"
, definiens = "(x) generally provides good causal estimates"
}
, { definiendum = "e"
, definiens = "nutritional epidemiology"
}
]
, argumentFormalization =
[ { premises =
[ { premise = "For all things, if a research method (x) consistently identifies associations that are later confirmed by randomized controlled trials, then research method (x) generally provides good causal estimates."
, notation = "(x(PxQx))"
}
, { premise = "Nutritional epidemiology consistently identifies associations that are later confirmed by randomized controlled trials."
, notation = "(P)e"
}
]
, conclusion = "Therefore, nutritional epidemiology generally provides good causal estimates."
, conclusionNotation = "(Qe)"
}
]
}