mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-12-07 06:27:14 -06:00
1.7 KiB
Executable file
1.7 KiB
Executable file
Argument for Eating Animals
| Definiendum | Definiens |
|---|---|
| P | it is immoral to kill someone (x) |
| Q | someone (x) values their life |
| R | someone (x) has the capacity to value their life |
| a | a given animal |
P1) For all things, it is immoral to kill someone if, and only if, someone values their life or someone has the capacity to value their life.
(∀x(Px↔(Qx∨Rx)))
P2) A given animal do not value their life.
(¬Qa)
P3) A given animal does not have the capacity to value their life.
(¬Ra)
C) Therefore, it is not immoral to kill a given animal.
(∴¬Pa)
(∀x(Px↔(Qx∨Rx)))
P2) A given animal do not value their life.
(¬Qa)
P3) A given animal does not have the capacity to value their life.
(¬Ra)
C) Therefore, it is not immoral to kill a given animal.
(∴¬Pa)
Analysis
- On what modality is it impossible for animals to value their lives?
- an adjective
- What is the contradiction on that modality?
- a proposition in conjunction with its negation
- Can you argue to that contradiction?
- an argument with premises and a conclusion
Hashtags
#debate #debate_opponents