# Debate 1 ## Proposition >"That carnivore/hyper-carnivore is best for optimal human health and is ethically appropriate." ## Analysis 1. what does "carnivore/hyper-carnivore" mean? If this is an inclusive disjunction, whichever diet is "less" carnivorous than the other will be one being argued for. - "" 2. what does "ethically appropriate" mean? What sort of ethics (rights, utility, rules?), Appropriate with regards to what? - "" ## Clarified Proposition 1 >"Red muscle meat diet with some bone marrow and salt supplies the nutrients that humans need to develop." ## Clarified Proposition 2 >"Red muscle meat diet with some bone marrow and salt is not shame-worthy." ## Clarified Proposition 3 >"Red muscle meat diet with some bone marrow and salt lacks phytochemicals that cause damage to the human body." ## Line of Questioning: ### What's the evidence? 1. Animal nutrients not found in plants - Lack of animal foods causes nutritional deficiencies - Brain size decreases with agriculture **(not evidence)** 2. Phytochemicals in plants - Pesticides in plants are carcinogenic **(not evidence)** 3. Limited adaptations for eating plants - Don't see carnivores benefitting from plants 4. Plants want to defend themselves with chemicals 5. Many anecdotes count in favour of the carnivore **(not evidence)** 6. Blue zones eat a lot of meat and live the longest **(not evidence)** 7. Carnivorous animals don't thrive on herbivorous diets **(not evidence)** 8. The removal of fibre could help constipation - We can only break down a small amount of the fibre 9. RCTs show that animal fat is superior to plant fat - MCE, SDHS, WHI **(not evidence)** 10. Paleolithic humans had the same life span as modern humans despite not having access to modern medicine **(not evidence)** - Maasi live to be over 100 **(not evidence)** 11. Harvard carnivore study **(not evidence)** ## Cherry on top Whatever he says, ask him if he would accept the same for X diet --- # Hashtags #debate #debate_opponents #clowns #clownery #carnivore #philosophy