# Debate 1 ## Proposition >"Killing odd-order predators is incompatible with veganism." ## Semantics 1. Veganism - an ethical stance against all forms human to non-human animals oppression." 2. Opression - use and/or abuse and/or exploitation. ## Analysis 1. Is it oppressive to let the murderers kill and eat a woman? - "" 2. Is it oppressive to let the lions kill and eat a woman? - "" 3. Is it oppressive to let the lions kill and eat a gazelle? - "" ### Reductio | **Definiendum** | **Definiens** | |:-------------------------------------------:|:--------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **V** | something (x) is vegan | | **E** | something (x) does not involve human on non-human animal exploitation | | **P** | the products (x) generated are not vegan | | **b** | bees pollinating human crops | | **a** | apples |
P1) Something is vegan if, and only if, something does not involve human on non-human animal exploitation.
(∀x(Vx↔¬Ex))
P2)
Bees pollinating human crops involves human on non-human exploitation.
(Eb)
P3)
If bees pollinating human crops is not vegan, then the products generated are not vegan.
(¬Vb→∀x(¬Px))
C)
Therefore, apples are not vegan.
(∴¬Pa)

[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Vx~4~3Ex)),(Eb),(~3Vb~5~6x(~3Px))|=(~3Pa)) --- # Hashtags #debate #debate_opponents #vegan