### Argument for Wearing Sunglasses
| **Definiendum** | **Definiens** |
|:-------------------------------------------:|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **P** | prolonged exposure to high-intensity UV radiation causes eye damage |
| **Q** | wearing sunglasses that block high-intensity UV radiation prevents eye damage |
| **R** | one (x) has the goal of preventing eye damage |
| **S** | one (x) is exposed to prolonged high-intensity UV radiation |
| **W** | one (x) should wear sunglasses |
| **b** | Ken Berry |
P1) If prolonged exposure to high-intensity UV radiation causes eye damage, then wearing sunglasses that block high-intensity UV radiation prevents eye damage.
(P→Q)
P2) If wearing sunglasses that block high-intensity UV radiation prevents eye damage and one has the goal of preventing eye damage, then if one is exposed to prolonged high-intensity UV radiation, then one should wear sunglasses.
(∀x(Q∧Rx→(Sx→Wx)))
P3) Prolonged exposure to high-intensity UV radiation causes eye damage and Ken Berry has the goal of preventing eye damage.
(P∧Rb)
C) Therefore, if Ken Berry is exposed to prolonged high-intensity UV radiation, then Ken Berry should wear sunglasses.
(∴Sb→Wb)
# Debate 1
## Proposition
> "Animal agriculture produces no unnecessary suffering."
## Argument
P1) If farming cows necessitates suffering, then farming cows produces no unnecessary suffering.
(P→Q)
P2) Farming cows necessitates suffering.
(P)
C) Therefore, farming cows produces no unnecessary suffering.
(∴Q)
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P)|=(Q))
## Analysis
### Reductio
P1) If stabbing babies necessitates suffering, then stabbing babies produces no unnecessary suffering.
(P→Q)
P2) Stabbing babies necessitates suffering.
(P)
C) Therefore, stabbing babies produces no unnecessary suffering.
(∴Q)
[Proof Tree]([Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P)|=(Q)))
---
# Malpractice Receipts
![[📂 Media/PDFs/ME012318.pdf]]
---
# Hashtags
#debate
#debate_opponents
#clowns
#clownery