# Debate 1
## Proposition
> "seed oils are poison."
## Argument
| **Definiendum** | **Definiens** |
|:-------------------------------------------:|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **M** | food (x) is poison |
| **P** | food (x) was created by a food industry that is largely controlled by marketing budgets of companies with no motivational avenue other than to promote addictions |
| **s** | seed oils |
| **w** | whole foods |
P1) The food is poison if, and only, if the food was created by a food industry that is largely controlled by marketing budgets of companies with no motivational avenue other than to promote addictions.
(∀x(Mx↔Px))
P2) Seed oils were created by a food industry that is largely controlled by marketing budgets of companies with no motivational avenue other than to promote addictions.
(Ms)
P3) Whole foods were not created by a food industry that is largely controlled by marketing budgets of companies with no motivational avenue other than to promote addictions.
(¬Mw)
C) Therefore, seed oils are poison and whole foods are not poison.
(∴Ps∧¬Pw)
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Mx~4Px)),(Ms),(~3Mw)|=(Ps~1~3Pw))
## Analysis
1. Argument for P1?
---
# Hashtags
#clowns
#clownery
#debate
#debate_opponents