# Debate 1 ## Proposition > "seed oils are poison." ## Argument | **Definiendum** | **Definiens** | |:-------------------------------------------:|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **M** | food (x) is poison | | **P** | food (x) was created by a food industry that is largely controlled by marketing budgets of companies with no motivational avenue other than to promote addictions | | **s** | seed oils | | **w** | whole foods |
P1) The food is poison if, and only, if the food was created by a food industry that is largely controlled by marketing budgets of companies with no motivational avenue other than to promote addictions.
(∀x(Mx↔Px))
P2)
Seed oils were created by a food industry that is largely controlled by marketing budgets of companies with no motivational avenue other than to promote addictions.
(Ms)
P3)
Whole foods were not created by a food industry that is largely controlled by marketing budgets of companies with no motivational avenue other than to promote addictions.
(¬Mw)
C)
Therefore, seed oils are poison and whole foods are not poison.
(∴Ps∧¬Pw)

[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Mx~4Px)),(Ms),(~3Mw)|=(Ps~1~3Pw)) ## Analysis 1. Argument for P1? --- # Hashtags #clowns #clownery #debate #debate_opponents