upRootNutrition/obsidian
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git synced 2025-06-15 15:45:11 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

vault backup: 2024-11-07 18:32:19

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-11-07 18:32:19 -06:00
parent 40e5074fde
commit feac698854
7 changed files with 160 additions and 37 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
🛡️ Debate/Arguments/Ancestry/Antagonistic Pleiotropy.md
View file

@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Essentially, human DNA tends to degrade over time when it doesn't rightfully nee
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If humans have more genetic adaptations to ancestral foods than novel foods, then antagonistic pleiotropy is more of a concern for ancestral foods than novel foods.
<b>P1)</b></font> If humans have more genetic adaptations to ancestral foods than novel foods, then antagonistic pleiotropy applies more to ancestral foods than novel foods.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P→Q)</b>
@ -105,12 +105,12 @@ Essentially, human DNA tends to degrade over time when it doesn't rightfully nee
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P)</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> If antagonistic pleiotropy is more of a concern for ancestral foods than novel foods, then novel foods that are equal in their short-term advantages to ancestral foods are more likely to be beneficial for long-term health.
<b>P3)</b></font> If antagonistic pleiotropy applies more to ancestral foods than novel foods, then ancestral foods are expected to decrease fitness in the post-reproductive window compared to novel foods.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(Q→R)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, novel foods that are equal in their short-term advantages to ancestral foods are more likely to be beneficial for long-term health.
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, ancestral foods are expected to decrease fitness in the post-reproductive window compared to novel foods.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴R)</b>

52
🛡️ Debate/Arguments/Science/Flat Earth Debunk.md Executable file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
### Summary
> The argument is structured to demonstrate that, within the context of a flat Earth model, if the stars are perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from the center, they cannot also be perceived as rotating clockwise from any point on the Earth.
### Flat Earth Internal Critique
| <font color="CC6600">**Definiendum**</font> | <font color="CC6600">**Definiens**</font> |
|:-------------------------------------------:|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| <font color="CC6600">**P(x,y)**</font> | (x) is perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from point (y) |
| <font color="CC6600">**Q(y,z)**</font> | (y) is on the same side of the rotational plane as (z) |
| <font color="CC6600">**R(x,z)**</font> | (x) will be perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from (z), as long as you are looking towards the plane |
| <font color="CC6600">**S(x,z)**</font> | (x) will be perceived as rotating clockwise from (z), as long as you are looking towards the plane |
| <font color="CC6600">**x**</font> | an object |
| <font color="CC6600">**y**</font> | vantage point A |
| <font color="CC6600">**z**</font> | vantage points B |
| <font color="CC6600">**k**</font> | stars in the sky |
| <font color="CC6600">**t**</font> | the center of the flat Earth |
| <font color="CC6600">**a**</font> | anywhere else on the flat Earth |
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If an object (x) is perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from vantage point A (y), then, for all vantage points B (z), if vantage point A (y) is on the same side of the rotational plane as vantage points B (z), then the object (x) will be perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from vantage points B (z), as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∀x∀y∀z(Pxy→(Qyz→Rxz)))</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> The stars in the sky are perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from the center of the flat Earth and the center of the flat Earth is on the same side of the rotational plane as anywhere else on the flat Earth.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(Pkt∧Qta)</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> If the stars in the sky are perceived as rotating counter-clockwise from anywhere else on the flat Earth, as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane, then the stars in the sky will not be perceived as rotating clockwise from anywhere else on the flat Earth, as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(Rka→¬Ska)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, the stars in the sky will not be perceived as rotating clockwise from anywhere else on the flat Earth, as long as you are looking towards the rotational plane.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬Ska)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
---
# Hashtags
#debate
#arguments
#flat_earth

32
🛡️ Debate/Opponents/Olicsa.md
View file

@ -7,7 +7,37 @@
## Analysis
1.
### Argument Against Collective Ownership
| <font color="CC6600">**Definiendum**</font> | <font color="CC6600">**Definiens**</font> |
|:-------------------------------------------:|:----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| <font color="CC6600">**Ownership**</font> | (x) has authority in disputes and has the final say in how the item is used |
| <font color="CC6600">**∃x(Cx)**</font> | (x) exists |
| <font color="CC6600">**∀y(Hy)**</font> | for all things, (y) in the collective has ownership over the item |
| <font color="CC6600">**x**</font> | collective ownership |
| <font color="CC6600">**y**</font> | everyone |
| <font color="CC6600">**z**</font> | one individual |
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If collective ownership exists, then, for all things, everyone in the collective has ownership over the item.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∃x(Cx)→∀y(Hy))</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> There exists at least one individual who does not have ownership over the item.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∃z(¬Hz))</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, collective ownership does not exist.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬∃x(Cx))</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
## Semantics