upRootNutrition/obsidian
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git synced 2025-06-16 14:25:11 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: reorganized hyperblog and added vitamin D paper

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-09-26 12:48:46 -05:00
parent 0fe545c254
commit e22bd788fe
167 changed files with 235 additions and 98 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

22
🛡️ Debate/Opponents/Tysca.md Executable file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
# Debate 1
## Proposition
~~>"genetically engineering humans is bad?"~~
~~>"improving humanity through genetic alteration is bad?"~~
## Analysis
1. Is this in principle? Meaning all else equal?
1. For example, let's say that we have two possible worlds that are equal, but in one world a human is genetically altered with at least one benefit to them and/or the people around them. Which world is better?
1. If genetic alternation world is better, you're not against it in principle.
2. If the "wildtype" world is better, then you're just crazy.
Didn't disagree with my view.
---
# Hashtags
#debate
#debate_opponents