upRootNutrition/obsidian
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git synced 2025-06-16 14:05:13 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: reorganized hyperblog and added vitamin D paper

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-09-26 12:48:46 -05:00
parent 0fe545c254
commit e22bd788fe
167 changed files with 235 additions and 98 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

70
🛡️ Debate/Opponents/Csypher.md Executable file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
# Debate 1
## Proposition
> "Preferences are gibberish"
## Argument
| <font color="CC6600">**Definiendum**</font> | <font color="CC6600">**Definiens**</font> |
|:-------------------------------------------:|:------------------------------------------------------- |
| <font color="CC6600">**P**</font> | one's concept (x) is private |
| <font color="CC6600">**E**</font> | others can have epistemic access to one's concept (x) |
| <font color="CC6600">**R**</font> | a concept (x) can have a shared referent |
| <font color="CC6600">**M**</font> | the concept (x) refers to material external to the mind |
| <font color="CC6600">**C**</font> | a concept (x) can be communicated |
| <font color="CC6600">**p**</font> | preference |
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> One's concept is private if, and only if, others cannot have epistemic access to one's concept.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∀x(Px↔¬Ex))</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> One's concept can have a shared referent if, and only if, one's concept refers to material external to the mind.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∀x(Rx↔Mx))</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> One's concept can be communicated if, and only if, one's concept is not private and one's concept can have a shared referent.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∀x(Cx↔¬Px∧Rx))</b>
<br />
<b>P4)</b></font> Others can not have epistemic access one's preferences.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬Ep)</b>
<br />
<b>P5)</b></font> One's preferences do not refer to material external to the mind.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬Mp)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, one's preferences cannot be communicated.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬Cp)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x(Px~4~3Ex)),(~6x(Rx~4Mx)),(~6x(Cx~4~3Px~1Rx)),(~3Ep),(~3Mp)|=(~3Cp))
## Analysis
1) No clear reason to accept P1, P2, or P3 until the modality for possibility/impossibility is provided.
2) No clear reason to accept P4 or P5. They're just empirical claims.
---
# Hashtags
#debate
#debate_opponents
#clowns
#clownery
#philosophy
#moral_subjectivism