feat: reorganized hyperblog and added vitamin D paper

🛡️ Debate/Opponents/Anti-War Mindset.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Debate 1
+
+## Proposition
+>"vegans kill more animals than non-vegans"
+
+## Clarified Proposition
+>"do you mean more animals die as a result of vegans making consumer choices as opposed to omnivores making consumer choices?"
+
+## Questions
+1. By this, do you mean more animals die as a result of vegans making consumer choices as opposed to omnivores making consumer choices?
+	1. answer: yes
+2. Is this in absolute or relative terms?
+	1. answer: relative
+3. What's the evidence that the proposition is true?
+	1. Required are empirics showing that more animals die when vegans make vegan consumer choices over omnivorous consumer choices, adjusted/truncated for biofuel and animal ag feed.
+	2. Statistics also need to be truncated to account for omnivores making consumer decisions consistent with veganism (such as buying bread).
+
+## Evidence
+
+- crop protection and production kills lots of animals
+- there's a worldwide decline in insects and birds (via pesticides and habitat change)
+	- compatible with veganism causing fewer deaths in the long run
+	- human activity leads to insect and bird deaths in animal ag scenarios too
+		- pasture for grass-fed
+		- crops for grain-fed
+	- none of this is interesting because there are no comparative analyses of consumer choices and their subsequent effects on animal death
+		- the only information we know from this is that crop ag kills lots of animals
+		- insufficient to make the case that more animals die from vegan, rather than omnivore, choices
+
+## Questions
+
+- would alternatives to crop ag
+
+## Argument
+
+P1) If you kill off animals to extinction, then ecosystems will break down
+P2) you kill off animals to extinction
+C) therefore, ecosystems will break down
+
+---
+
+# Hashtags
+
+#debate 
+#debate_opponents 
+#clowns 
+#clownery