upRootNutrition/obsidian
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git synced 2025-06-15 23:15:12 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: 5/10/24 update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-10-05 01:01:51 -05:00
parent e22bd788fe
commit da37ce527c
32 changed files with 1130 additions and 45001 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

34
🛡️ Debate/Arguments/Gender/Trans-Skepticism.md Executable file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
### Trans-Skepticism Argument
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If there is not a known symmetry-breaker between identified, transitioned trans people and identified, de-transitioned trans people, then we do not have epistemic access to the means of parsing legitimate trans people from illegitimate trans people.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬P→¬Q)</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> If we do not have epistemic access to the means of parsing legitimate trans people from illegitimate trans people, then there is not a clear epistemically virtuous reason to accept the legitimacy of trans identity.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬Q→¬R)</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> There is not a known symmetry-breaker between identified, transitioned trans people and identified, de-transitioned trans people.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬P)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, there is not a clear epistemically virtuous reason to accept the legitimacy of trans identity.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬R)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
---
# Hashtag
#debate
#arguments