upRootNutrition/obsidian
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git synced 2025-06-16 08:05:12 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Initial commit

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-06-28 02:13:12 -05:00
commit bc15d67574
1475 changed files with 1056167 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

43
🛡️ Debate/🪶 Arguments/Philosophy/Agnosticism.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
### Agnosticism Argument
| <font color="CC6600">**Variable**</font> | <font color="CC6600">**Definition**</font> |
|:----------------------------------------:|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| <font color="CC6600">**U**</font> | one (x) can unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition (y) |
| <font color="CC6600">**K**</font> | one (x) knows why they believe that a proposition (y) is true |
| <font color="CC6600">**W**</font> | one (x) should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition (y) is true |
| <font color="CC6600">**o**</font> | the interlocutor |
| <font color="CC6600">**r**</font> | the proposition at hand |
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If one cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on a proposition, then one does does not know why they believe that a proposition is true.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∀x∀y(¬Uxy→¬Kxy))</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> If one does not know why they believe that a proposition is true, then one should temporarily withhold the belief that a proposition is true.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∀x∀y(¬Kxy→Wxy))</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> The interlocutor cannot unpack what evidence would lead them to change their doxastic attitude on the proposition at hand.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬Uor)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, the interlocutor should temporarily withhold the belief that the proposition at hand is true.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴Wor)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~3Uxy~5~3Kxy)),(~6x~6y(~3Kxy~5Wxy)),(~3Uor)|=(Wor))
## Hashtags
#arguments
#philosophy
#debate

77
🛡️ Debate/🪶 Arguments/Philosophy/Modus Bronens.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
## Modus Bronens
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If studies show that PUFA is preferable to SFA for heart disease prevention, then people who wish to lower their heart disease risk should generally lower their SFA intake and increase their PUFA intake.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P→Q)</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> I don't like Nick's face.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬N)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, studies do not show that PUFA is preferable to SFA for heart disease prevention and people who wish to lower their heart disease risk should not generally lower their SFA intake and increase their PUFA intake.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬P∧¬Q)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
---
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If LDL causes CVD, then those whose LDL increases in response to a carnivore diet should take steps to lower their LDL.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P→Q)</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> Nick is not the epitome of health.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬N)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, LDL does not cause CVD and those whose LDL increases in response to a carnivore diet should not take steps to lower their LDL.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬P∧¬Q)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
---
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If Anna does act in bad faith, then Nick is justified in blocking Anna.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P→Q)</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> I don't like the fact that Nick uses pragmatic markers in his discourse.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(¬N)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, Anna does not act in bad faith and Nick is not justified in blocking Anna.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴¬P∧¬Q)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
---
## Hashtags
#clownery
#philosophy
#logic
#propositional_logic

42
🛡️ Debate/🪶 Arguments/Philosophy/Philosophy Gibberish.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
direct reference
externalist epistemology
metaphysical modality
ontological modality
phenomenal conservatism
transcendental realism
correspondence theory of truth
disjunctivism
libertarian free will
theism
content internalism
subjective idealism
parallelism
pre-established harmony
epiphenomenalism
non-entailing explanations
causal powers
inductive arguments
abductive arguments
metaphysical essence
relative identity
stance-independent norm
non-inferential justification
private language
moral particles
ultimate grounds
invariant justification
transcendental oneness
equal ultimacy
personal creation
single consciousness ontology
mind-heart connection
synthetic a priori
non-physical mental entities
externalist value
warrant
---
# Hashtags
#philosophy