upRootNutrition/obsidian
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git synced 2025-06-16 07:15:12 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Initial commit

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nick 2024-06-28 02:13:12 -05:00
commit bc15d67574
1475 changed files with 1056167 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

36
🛡️ Debate/🪶 Arguments/Ancestry/Anabolic Potential on Keto.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If a higher proportion of amino acids are spent on gluconeogenesis while on ketogenic diets compared to non-ketogenic diets, then a lower proportion of amino acids are available for hypertrophy on ketogenic diets compared to non-ketogenic diets.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P→Q)</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> A higher proportion of amino acids are spent on gluconeogenesis while on ketogenic diets compared to non-ketogenic diets.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P)</b>
<br />
<b>P3)</b></font> If a lower proportion of amino acids are available for hypertrophy on ketogenic diets compared to non-ketogenic diets, then ketogenic diets are likely to cost anabolic potential compared to non-ketogenic diets.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(Q→R)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, ketogenic diets are likely to cost anabolic potential compared to non-ketogenic diets.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴R)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P),(Q~5R)|=(R))
---
# Hashtags
#arguments
#debate
#keto
#hypertrophy