feat: added hyperblog

💻 Hyperblog/Work/mechanistic speculation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+Mechanistic speculation in health sciences can be problematic from an epistemic standpoint for several reasons:
+
+1. **Complexity of biological systems:** Human health and disease involve intricate, interconnected systems that are often not fully understood. Speculating about mechanisms without sufficient evidence can oversimplify these complex relationships.
+2. **Risk of confirmation bias:** Researchers may be tempted to fit data to their proposed mechanisms, potentially overlooking contradictory evidence or alternative explanations.
+3. **Lack of empirical support:** Speculative mechanisms often lack robust empirical evidence, making them unreliable bases for clinical decisions or further research.
+4. **Potential for misleading conclusions:** Unfounded mechanistic explanations can lead to incorrect assumptions about disease processes or treatment efficacy, potentially misdirecting research efforts or clinical practice.
+5. **Difficulty in falsification:** Speculative mechanisms may be challenging to disprove, leading to the persistence of incorrect ideas in the scientific literature.
+6. **Resource allocation issues:** Pursuing research based on speculative mechanisms may divert resources from more promising evidence-based approaches.
+7. **Ethical concerns:** In clinical settings, basing treatments on speculative mechanisms rather than evidence-based practices can put patients at risk.
+
+Instead of relying on mechanistic speculation, the health sciences generally prioritize empirical evidence, rigorous experimental and observational study designs, and validated statistical analyses to draw conclusions.
+
+>**Example:** "Of course seed oils increase the risk of heart disease, because they oxidize LDL particles, and oxidization of LDL particles is a necessary step in heart disease!"
+
+---
+
+# Hashtags
+
+#fallacies 
+#mechanistic_speculation 
+#hyperblog