mirror of
https://gitlab.com/upRootNutrition/obsidian.git
synced 2025-06-15 15:35:12 -05:00
81 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
81 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
|
## Debate 1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Proposition:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
>Veganism is impossible
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. What is meant by "veganism" here?
|
|||
|
|
2. On what modality is veganism impossible?
|
|||
|
|
1. sounds like a deontic modality
|
|||
|
|
2. If veganism is deontologically impossible, it must be in virtue of some other impossibility that constrains action.
|
|||
|
|
3. On what modality is it impossible to casually stroll without causing animal suffering?
|
|||
|
|
3. Why is it assumed that veganism is a deontological thesis?
|
|||
|
|
1. If it's not assumed that veganism is a deontological thesis, then what's the argument that the action of walking is less compatible with vegan principles than not walking?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Clarified Proposition:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
>Veganism is unlikely
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. What does it mean for veganism to be unlikely?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#### Brian's Argument For Impossible Veganism
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**Definiendum**</font> | <font color="CC6600">**Definiens**</font> |
|
|||
|
|
|:-------------------------------------------:|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|||
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**V**</font> | it is possible for (x) one to be vegan |
|
|||
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**S**</font> | it is possible for (x) one's (y) actions to cause animal suffering absence of survival necessity |
|
|||
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**h**</font> | human |
|
|||
|
|
| <font color="CC6600">**e**</font> | existence |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
<div style="text-align: center">
|
|||
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|||
|
|
<b>P1)</b></font> It's possible for one to be vegan if and only if it's possible for one's actions to not cause animal suffering in the absence of survival necessity.
|
|||
|
|
<br />
|
|||
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|||
|
|
<b>(∀x∀y(◇Vx↔◇¬Sxy))</b>
|
|||
|
|
<br />
|
|||
|
|
<b>P2)</b></font> Human existence necessitates animal suffering in the absence of survival necessity.
|
|||
|
|
<br />
|
|||
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|||
|
|
<b>(▢She)</b>
|
|||
|
|
<br />
|
|||
|
|
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, it is impossible for humans to be vegan.
|
|||
|
|
<br />
|
|||
|
|
<font color="CC6600">
|
|||
|
|
<b>(∴¬◇Vh)</b>
|
|||
|
|
<br />
|
|||
|
|
<br />
|
|||
|
|
</font>
|
|||
|
|
</div>
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(~6x~6y(~9Vx~4~9~3Sxy)),(~8She)|=(~3~9Vh))
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Debate 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Definition
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
>Reducetarianism is the practice of eating less meat - red meat, poultry, and seafood - as well as less dairy and fewer eggs, regardless of the degree or motivation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### My Proposition
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
>Reducetarianism is either subsumed by my definition OR leads to absurdity OR leads to a contradiction.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Receipts:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
![[📂 Media/Images/Pasted image 20230411160120.png]]
|
|||
|
|
![[📂 Media/Images/Pasted image 20230411160134.png]]
|
|||
|
|
![[📂 Media/Images/Pasted image 20230411160144.png]]
|
|||
|
|
![[📂 Media/Images/Pasted image 20230411160152.png]]
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Hashtags
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#debate
|
|||
|
|
#debate_opponents
|
|||
|
|
#clowns
|
|||
|
|
#clownery
|
|||
|
|
#vegan
|
|||
|
|
#cropdeaths
|