obsidian/🛡️ Debate/🗡️ Opponents/Jevan.md

58 lines
1,016 B
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2024-06-28 02:13:12 -05:00
# Debate 2
## Proposition
> "cows can't live if humans don't eat them."
## Analysis
1. on what modality?
1. what's the contradiction?
2. can you infer to that contradiction?
2. if not a modal claim, what is even being said?
---
# Debate 1
## Proposition
> "animal agriculture is morally superior because future cows want to live."
## Argument
<div style="text-align: center">
<font color="CC6600">
<b>P1)</b></font> If future cows will want to live, then future cows will be bred.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P→Q)</b>
<br />
<b>P2)</b></font> Future cows will want to live.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(P)</b>
<br />
<b>C)</b></font> Therefore, future cows will be bred.
<br />
<font color="CC6600">
<b>(∴Q)</b>
<br />
<br />
</font>
</div>
[Proof Tree](https://www.umsu.de/trees/#(P~5Q),(P)|=(Q))
## Analysis
1. What the fuck does it mean for a non-existent being to want something?
---
# Hashtags
#debate
#debate_opponents
#clowns
#clownery
#vegan
#agriculture
#animal_agriculture